Germany and Japan: “Reluctant warriors” no more?

Signifying the return of great power revisionism by all means, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has had a dramatic impact on the security and defense postures of Germany and Japan, two key US allies with strong anti-military foreign policy traditions based on peace constitutions. In analyzing the two countries’ far-reaching adjustments between 2022 and 2024, this article reflects on four major factors to explain the respective trajectories: threat perceptions, domestic political processes and settings, international institutional settings and alliance structures, and the influence of anti-militarist political cultures. While we identify a reorientation of Germany and Japan towards greater efforts for individual and collective self-defense due to increased threat perceptions, the residual influence of their anti-militarist cultures continues to restrain defense policy changes and their implementation. Interwoven into both countries’ domestic politics, those cultures have pervaded the material and institutional foundations of their security and defense policies in sustained ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Comparative Politics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911251326143
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Germany and Japan: “Reluctant warriors” no more?

Kerstin Lukner, Hanns W. Maull, Thomas U. Berger, Ellis S. Krauss et al.
Asian Journal of Comparative Politics
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Germany and Japan: “Reluctant warriors” no more?

Kerstin Lukner, Hanns W. Maull, Thomas U. Berger, Ellis S. Krauss, Alexandra Sakaki
article en

Abstract

Signifying the return of great power revisionism by all means, Russia's invasion of Ukraine has had a dramatic impact on the security and defense postures of Germany and Japan, two key US allies with strong anti-military foreign policy traditions based on peace constitutions. In analyzing the two countries’ far-reaching adjustments between 2022 and 2024, this article reflects on four major factors to explain the respective trajectories: threat perceptions, domestic political processes and settings, international institutional settings and alliance structures, and the influence of anti-militarist political cultures. While we identify a reorientation of Germany and Japan towards greater efforts for individual and collective self-defense due to increased threat perceptions, the residual influence of their anti-militarist cultures continues to restrain defense policy changes and their implementation. Interwoven into both countries’ domestic politics, those cultures have pervaded the material and institutional foundations of their security and defense policies in sustained ways.

Asian Journal of Comparative PoliticsVol. 10(3)
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE), Boston University (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Germany and Japan: “Reluctant warriors” no more? — Kerstin Lukner, Hanns W. Maull, et al. · Asian Journal of Comparative Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS