Oropharyngeal Bee, Hornet, Yellow Jacket, and Wasp Stings: A National Electronic Injury Surveillance System Analysis and Scoping Review

IntroductionIt is estimated that up to 94.5% of the adult population has received at least 1 Hymenoptera sting in their lifetime, which includes stings from bees, hornets, yellow jackets, or wasps. This study describes the epidemiology of oropharyngeal stings due to bees, hornets, yellow jackets, and wasps in the United States between 2004 and 2023.MethodsThis study used data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System to describe patients with stings who presented to US hospitals for treatment. It then contextualized these findings through a scoping review of case reports of oropharyngeal stings published on Scopus and PubMed, with particular attention to the hospital disposition of cases.ResultsThe National Electronic Injury Surveillance System analysis found that an estimated 5% of all stings involved the oropharyngeal region. The rate of oropharyngeal stings has varied over time, and an estimated 2% of victims were admitted to the hospital for any reason. This finding stands in contrast to the review of case reports, in which 64% of victims were hospitalized.ConclusionsOropharyngeal stings present a unique risk of airway compromise and merit conservative treatment, which may include hospitalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251323507
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oropharyngeal Bee, Hornet, Yellow Jacket, and Wasp Stings: A National Electronic Injury Surveillance System Analysis and Scoping Review

Scott W. Keith, Andrew Huff, Lara Phillips
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Oropharyngeal Bee, Hornet, Yellow Jacket, and Wasp Stings: A National Electronic Injury Surveillance System Analysis and Scoping Review

Scott W. Keith, Andrew Huff, Lara Phillips
article en

Abstract

IntroductionIt is estimated that up to 94.5% of the adult population has received at least 1 Hymenoptera sting in their lifetime, which includes stings from bees, hornets, yellow jackets, or wasps. This study describes the epidemiology of oropharyngeal stings due to bees, hornets, yellow jackets, and wasps in the United States between 2004 and 2023.MethodsThis study used data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System to describe patients with stings who presented to US hospitals for treatment. It then contextualized these findings through a scoping review of case reports of oropharyngeal stings published on Scopus and PubMed, with particular attention to the hospital disposition of cases.ResultsThe National Electronic Injury Surveillance System analysis found that an estimated 5% of all stings involved the oropharyngeal region. The rate of oropharyngeal stings has varied over time, and an estimated 2% of victims were admitted to the hospital for any reason. This finding stands in contrast to the review of case reports, in which 64% of victims were hospitalized.ConclusionsOropharyngeal stings present a unique risk of airway compromise and merit conservative treatment, which may include hospitalization.

Wilderness and Environmental MedicineVol. 36(2)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.