Comparison of camera calibration methods for particle tracking velocimetry

Abstract Camera calibration is a key component of three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) experiments, and its proper implementation is key to the success of the method. In this paper, we review and compare four different camera calibration models used in PTV experiments without volumetric refinement. One of the calibration models is new and provides an analytical inversion of the Soloff polynomial. The other three calibration models are taken from three established open source PTV frameworks: OpenPTV, MyPTV and proPTV. In particular, we present a general formulation of calibration models that allows their rigorous comparison and evaluation with respect to their 3D-to-2D projection errors and 2D-to-3D reconstruction errors. We compare the models and the calibration errors in three different tasks, including extrapolation and interpolation of marker points, using a realistic calibration of an experimental camera setup. In the end, we conclude with the pros and cons of each method in order to be able to choose the most suitable one for individual needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/adc6a2
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Optical measurement and interference techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of camera calibration methods for particle tracking velocimetry

Robin Barta, Ron Shnapp, Alex Liberzon
5 citations
Measurement Science and Technology
Optical measurement and interference techniques
6.38
article

Comparison of camera calibration methods for particle tracking velocimetry

Robin Barta, Ron Shnapp, Alex Liberzon
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Camera calibration is a key component of three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) experiments, and its proper implementation is key to the success of the method. In this paper, we review and compare four different camera calibration models used in PTV experiments without volumetric refinement. One of the calibration models is new and provides an analytical inversion of the Soloff polynomial. The other three calibration models are taken from three established open source PTV frameworks: OpenPTV, MyPTV and proPTV. In particular, we present a general formulation of calibration models that allows their rigorous comparison and evaluation with respect to their 3D-to-2D projection errors and 2D-to-3D reconstruction errors. We compare the models and the calibration errors in three different tasks, including extrapolation and interpolation of marker points, using a realistic calibration of an experimental camera setup. In the end, we conclude with the pros and cons of each method in order to be able to choose the most suitable one for individual needs.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 36(5)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Optical measurement and interference techniques
6.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of camera calibration methods for particle tracking velocimetry — Robin Barta, Ron Shnapp, et al. · Measurement Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS