Associations of Naples prognostic score with stroke in adults and all cause mortality among stroke patients

This study seeks to assess the associations of Naples Prognostic Score with stroke in adults and all cause mortality among stroke patients. We analyzed data from 44,601 participants in the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) was derived from total cholesterol, serum albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Participants were classified into three groups based on their NPS. Stroke incidence was determined through self-reported questionnaires, and mortality data were diligently tracked using the National Death Index. We investigated the relationship between NPS and stroke prevalence using multiple logistic regression analysis. To explore the association between NPS and all cause mortality in stroke survivors, we applied Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Furthermore, we conducted a detailed subgroup analysis to assess interaction effects on all cause mortality risk within this population. The median age of the participants was 50.00 years [interquartile range: 35.00-64.00], with males comprising 49.36% of the study. The overall stroke prevalence was 3.93%. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their NPS: 6,328 (18.1%) in Group 0 (NPS 0), 24,015 (68.8%) in Group 1 (NPS 1 or 2), and 4,580 (13.1%) in Group 2 (NPS 3 or 4). After adjusting for covariates, individuals in Group 2 exhibited a significantly higher stroke prevalence compared to Group 0, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.82 [95% confidence interval: 1.48-2.23]. Among the 1372 patients with a history of stroke, with a median follow-up duration of 5.94 years, we utilized Cox proportional hazards models to assess the relationship between NPS and all cause mortality risk. The analysis revealed that, after adjusting for covariates, stroke patients in Group 2 faced a significantly elevated risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21 [95% confidence interval: 1.44-3.11]) compared to those in Group 0. Subsequent subgroup analyses to explore interaction effects on all cause mortality risk among stroke patients shown no significant interactions (p for interaction > 0.05). This study indicate a positive correlation between NPS and the risk of stroke in adults, as well as all cause mortality in stroke patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94975-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of Naples prognostic score with stroke in adults and all cause mortality among stroke patients

Gaiqing Yang, Xiaoqing Yang, Xiaochang Li, Zhiqiang Xu et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
4.06
article

Associations of Naples prognostic score with stroke in adults and all cause mortality among stroke patients

Gaiqing Yang, Xiaoqing Yang, Xiaochang Li, Zhiqiang Xu, Caihong He, Lixia Xu, Dongya Zhang, Weizhong Xiao, Minyue Pei, Ruilei Guan, Jijun Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study seeks to assess the associations of Naples Prognostic Score with stroke in adults and all cause mortality among stroke patients. We analyzed data from 44,601 participants in the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) was derived from total cholesterol, serum albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Participants were classified into three groups based on their NPS. Stroke incidence was determined through self-reported questionnaires, and mortality data were diligently tracked using the National Death Index. We investigated the relationship between NPS and stroke prevalence using multiple logistic regression analysis. To explore the association between NPS and all cause mortality in stroke survivors, we applied Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Furthermore, we conducted a detailed subgroup analysis to assess interaction effects on all cause mortality risk within this population. The median age of the participants was 50.00 years [interquartile range: 35.00-64.00], with males comprising 49.36% of the study. The overall stroke prevalence was 3.93%. Participants were categorized into three groups based on their NPS: 6,328 (18.1%) in Group 0 (NPS 0), 24,015 (68.8%) in Group 1 (NPS 1 or 2), and 4,580 (13.1%) in Group 2 (NPS 3 or 4). After adjusting for covariates, individuals in Group 2 exhibited a significantly higher stroke prevalence compared to Group 0, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.82 [95% confidence interval: 1.48-2.23]. Among the 1372 patients with a history of stroke, with a median follow-up duration of 5.94 years, we utilized Cox proportional hazards models to assess the relationship between NPS and all cause mortality risk. The analysis revealed that, after adjusting for covariates, stroke patients in Group 2 faced a significantly elevated risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21 [95% confidence interval: 1.44-3.11]) compared to those in Group 0. Subsequent subgroup analyses to explore interaction effects on all cause mortality risk among stroke patients shown no significant interactions (p for interaction > 0.05). This study indicate a positive correlation between NPS and the risk of stroke in adults, as well as all cause mortality in stroke patients.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Peking University (CN), Zhengzhou Central Hospital (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
4.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.