Thermally driven ultrapure water production for water electrolysis – A techno-economic analysis of membrane distillation

The transition to hydrogen production with renewable energies necessitates ultrapure water (UPW) as a raw material for water electrolysis, which imposes stringent quality and economic demands on water treatment technologies. This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of membrane distillation (MD) as an alternative to reverse osmosis (RO) for UPW production. Utilizing waste heat from a 5 MW proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer, which would otherwise require active cooling to sustain operation of the electrolyzer, the proposed MD system employs permeate gap membrane distillation to treat feedwaters with brackish and seawater salinities (i.e., 5 g NaCl /kg and 34.3 g NaCl/kg, respectively). The study incorporates numerical simulations to analyse system design parameters and energy consumption of MD and RO systems designed to produce 1 t/h of distillate, as well as experimental data on distillate water quality. Results demonstrate that MD systems achieve high-quality distillate (<3 μS/cm) under the tested salinities and at competitive costs. Estimated unit costs per ton of produced distillate for MD range from €2.33 to €2.85 for either brackish or seawater feed at electricity prices of €0.10–€0.40/kWh, while RO costs range from €2.80 to €5.51 under comparable conditions. The presented annual costs also reflect the cost advantage, especially for seawater desalination with MD costs, approx. 40 % lower than RO. MD shows advantages in energy efficiency with thermal energy provided as low-grade heat. This work shows that MD can be a cost- efficient and versatile solution for UPW production powered by PEM electrolyzer waste heat. • MD module design specifically for integration with electrolyzer waste heat • Distillate quality experiments yield conductivity under 3 μS/cm • Comparable RO system design and economic comparison with MD • MD proves to be more cost efficient than RO when waste heat is available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Desalination
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.118848
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermally driven ultrapure water production for water electrolysis – A techno-economic analysis of membrane distillation

Y. Morales, Florencia Saravia, Jeremy W. Singer, R. Schwantes et al.
9 citations
Desalination
Membrane Separation Technologies
7.35
article

Thermally driven ultrapure water production for water electrolysis – A techno-economic analysis of membrane distillation

Y. Morales, Florencia Saravia, Jeremy W. Singer, R. Schwantes, K. Chavan, E. Pomp
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The transition to hydrogen production with renewable energies necessitates ultrapure water (UPW) as a raw material for water electrolysis, which imposes stringent quality and economic demands on water treatment technologies. This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of membrane distillation (MD) as an alternative to reverse osmosis (RO) for UPW production. Utilizing waste heat from a 5 MW proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer, which would otherwise require active cooling to sustain operation of the electrolyzer, the proposed MD system employs permeate gap membrane distillation to treat feedwaters with brackish and seawater salinities (i.e., 5 g NaCl /kg and 34.3 g NaCl/kg, respectively). The study incorporates numerical simulations to analyse system design parameters and energy consumption of MD and RO systems designed to produce 1 t/h of distillate, as well as experimental data on distillate water quality. Results demonstrate that MD systems achieve high-quality distillate (<3 μS/cm) under the tested salinities and at competitive costs. Estimated unit costs per ton of produced distillate for MD range from €2.33 to €2.85 for either brackish or seawater feed at electricity prices of €0.10–€0.40/kWh, while RO costs range from €2.80 to €5.51 under comparable conditions. The presented annual costs also reflect the cost advantage, especially for seawater desalination with MD costs, approx. 40 % lower than RO. MD shows advantages in energy efficiency with thermal energy provided as low-grade heat. This work shows that MD can be a cost- efficient and versatile solution for UPW production powered by PEM electrolyzer waste heat. • MD module design specifically for integration with electrolyzer waste heat • Distillate quality experiments yield conductivity under 3 μS/cm • Comparable RO system design and economic comparison with MD • MD proves to be more cost efficient than RO when waste heat is available.

DesalinationVol. 608
Aqon Water Solutions (Germany) (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (DE), DVGW-Forschungsstelle am Engler-Bunte-Institut des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Membrane Separation Technologies
7.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.