Where to? Gender studies, epistemic injustice and the politics of de-democratization in Romania

This article examines the 2020 attempt to ban gender studies in Romania, where we played key roles in resistance efforts and were directly targeted by anti-gender activists. We address two research questions: first, ‘How can researchers’ positionality be conceptualized when the authors are targets?’; and, second, ‘How can we integrate our dual roles as researchers and activists in the production of knowledge while also exploring the nature and impact of these attacks?’. We introduce a novel epistemological and ethical framework that integrates reflection on researchers’ positionality and emotions. We conceptualize researchers’ positionality as ‘outsiders within’ in social and academic contexts and epistemic agents at the intersection of research and activism. Using feminist autoethnography, we complement traditional methodologies in studying anti-gender campaigns and far-right mobilizations. This approach allows us to better understand de-democratization dynamics and highlight the persistent epistemic injustices and normalization of violence that these movements perpetuate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2025d000000081
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where to? Gender studies, epistemic injustice and the politics of de-democratization in Romania

Oana Băluță, Ionela Băluţă
4 citations
European Journal of Politics and Gender
Political and Economic history of UK and US
34.09
article

Where to? Gender studies, epistemic injustice and the politics of de-democratization in Romania

Oana Băluță, Ionela Băluţă
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article examines the 2020 attempt to ban gender studies in Romania, where we played key roles in resistance efforts and were directly targeted by anti-gender activists. We address two research questions: first, ‘How can researchers’ positionality be conceptualized when the authors are targets?’; and, second, ‘How can we integrate our dual roles as researchers and activists in the production of knowledge while also exploring the nature and impact of these attacks?’. We introduce a novel epistemological and ethical framework that integrates reflection on researchers’ positionality and emotions. We conceptualize researchers’ positionality as ‘outsiders within’ in social and academic contexts and epistemic agents at the intersection of research and activism. Using feminist autoethnography, we complement traditional methodologies in studying anti-gender campaigns and far-right mobilizations. This approach allows us to better understand de-democratization dynamics and highlight the persistent epistemic injustices and normalization of violence that these movements perpetuate.

European Journal of Politics and Gender
National School of Political Science and Public Administration (RO), University of Bucharest (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.