Brazilian Version of the Coparenting Relationship Scale: Reliability and Validity Evidence

Abstract: The coparenting relationship plays a central role in family interactions. However, Brazil lacks information on the psychometric properties of internationally recognized instruments to assess coparenting. Escala da Relação Coparental (CRS-BR) is the Brazilian version of the Coparenting Relationship Scale. In this study, we examine: (a) internal validity evidence of the CRS-BR based on confirmatory factor analysis and gender invariance tests; (b) reliability evidence of each instrument factor, and (c) external validity evidence based on discriminant validity and correlations with measures of theoretically-related constructs. Participants included 238 mothers and 195 fathers with children aged up to 6 years of age. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit for the Brazilian participants using the same six factors that showed satisfactory reliability levels for North American parents. Additionally, we found evidence for configural, metric and scalar invariance regarding the parents’ gender. The six CRS-BR subscales demonstrated acceptable reliability. As for evidence of discriminant validity, only two CRS-BR factors (undermining and conflict) exhibited higher than expected correlations with father’s social desirability scores. Consistent with the literature, we found some correlations between coparenting and child adjustment. Our results offer substantial support for contemporary coparenting theories and indicate that the CRS-BR can be used with Brazilian parents of children up to six years old, thus facilitating the integration of Brazilian findings with international work on coparenting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psicologia Ciência e Profissão
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703003279256
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brazilian Version of the Coparenting Relationship Scale: Reliability and Validity Evidence

Elizabeth Joan Barham, Damon Jones, Thaís Ramos de Carvalho, Mark E. Feinberg
1 citations
Psicologia Ciência e Profissão
Family Dynamics and Relationships
5.59
article

Brazilian Version of the Coparenting Relationship Scale: Reliability and Validity Evidence

Elizabeth Joan Barham, Damon Jones, Thaís Ramos de Carvalho, Mark E. Feinberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The coparenting relationship plays a central role in family interactions. However, Brazil lacks information on the psychometric properties of internationally recognized instruments to assess coparenting. Escala da Relação Coparental (CRS-BR) is the Brazilian version of the Coparenting Relationship Scale. In this study, we examine: (a) internal validity evidence of the CRS-BR based on confirmatory factor analysis and gender invariance tests; (b) reliability evidence of each instrument factor, and (c) external validity evidence based on discriminant validity and correlations with measures of theoretically-related constructs. Participants included 238 mothers and 195 fathers with children aged up to 6 years of age. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit for the Brazilian participants using the same six factors that showed satisfactory reliability levels for North American parents. Additionally, we found evidence for configural, metric and scalar invariance regarding the parents’ gender. The six CRS-BR subscales demonstrated acceptable reliability. As for evidence of discriminant validity, only two CRS-BR factors (undermining and conflict) exhibited higher than expected correlations with father’s social desirability scores. Consistent with the literature, we found some correlations between coparenting and child adjustment. Our results offer substantial support for contemporary coparenting theories and indicate that the CRS-BR can be used with Brazilian parents of children up to six years old, thus facilitating the integration of Brazilian findings with international work on coparenting.

Psicologia Ciência e ProfissãoVol. 45
Pennsylvania State University (US), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.