Advancing soil texture and organic carbon spatial variability assessment: Integrating proximal γ-ray spectroscopy and electromagnetic induction via data fusion for site-independent analysis

• EC a and γ-radiation allow to study SOC and granulometry classes variability. • Data fusion with ANN and PLSR were used to predict soil variability. • γ-ray total count and EC a explained soil variability across fields. • Data fusion achieved 88% accuracy for clay and 74% for SOC. In this study we tested the combination of two proximal sensors –an electromagnetic conductivity meter (EMI) and a gamma(γ)-ray detector– to estimate the variability of some soil properties. The hypothesis was that the employment of data fusion techniques would provide a more comprehensive description of soil texture and soil organic carbon (SOC) content compared to using single sensors alone. This approach aimed to capture a spectrum of characteristics across various mineral and organic alluvial soils. Field surveys covering more than 60 ha were conducted in 2019 on five agricultural experimental sites, whose texture ranged from silty-clay to silty- and sandy-loam and SOC from 0.5 % to 21.9 %. A total of 354 undisturbed soil samples (0–30 cm) was collected and soil properties such as granulometry, bulk density and SOC concentration and stock determined. The fusion of proximal sensing data of apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) and γ-ray radionuclides (total counts –TC–, 238 U, 232 Th, 40 K) combined with multivariate analysis was applied to describe soil spatial variability. Partial leas square regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and tested to predict the variability in soil properties within and between sites. Results showed that data fusion captured the soil spatial variability within and between fields, with a predictive ability (test set) to explain up to 88 % of clay and 74 % of SOC stock variability when all mineral soils were embedded in the ANN model. The combination of TC and EC a was particularly effective in explaining texture and SOC heterogeneity within and across fields. In contrast, different responses were observed for single radionuclides, either 238 U, 232 Th, 40 K, or their ratios, within each field, that likely identified site-specific radioisotope enrichment and/or depletion processes. In conclusion, data fusion of EMI and γ-ray detectors accurately predicted soil texture and SOC across soils from alluvial origin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108980
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing soil texture and organic carbon spatial variability assessment: Integrating proximal γ-ray spectroscopy and electromagnetic induction via data fusion for site-independent analysis

Luigi Sartori, Ilaria Piccoli, Beatrice Portelli, Nicola Dal Ferro et al.
4 citations
CATENA
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
3.20
article

Advancing soil texture and organic carbon spatial variability assessment: Integrating proximal γ-ray spectroscopy and electromagnetic induction via data fusion for site-independent analysis

Luigi Sartori, Ilaria Piccoli, Beatrice Portelli, Nicola Dal Ferro, Francesco Morari, Giuseppe Serra, Anna Ros
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• EC a and γ-radiation allow to study SOC and granulometry classes variability. • Data fusion with ANN and PLSR were used to predict soil variability. • γ-ray total count and EC a explained soil variability across fields. • Data fusion achieved 88% accuracy for clay and 74% for SOC. In this study we tested the combination of two proximal sensors –an electromagnetic conductivity meter (EMI) and a gamma(γ)-ray detector– to estimate the variability of some soil properties. The hypothesis was that the employment of data fusion techniques would provide a more comprehensive description of soil texture and soil organic carbon (SOC) content compared to using single sensors alone. This approach aimed to capture a spectrum of characteristics across various mineral and organic alluvial soils. Field surveys covering more than 60 ha were conducted in 2019 on five agricultural experimental sites, whose texture ranged from silty-clay to silty- and sandy-loam and SOC from 0.5 % to 21.9 %. A total of 354 undisturbed soil samples (0–30 cm) was collected and soil properties such as granulometry, bulk density and SOC concentration and stock determined. The fusion of proximal sensing data of apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) and γ-ray radionuclides (total counts –TC–, 238 U, 232 Th, 40 K) combined with multivariate analysis was applied to describe soil spatial variability. Partial leas square regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and tested to predict the variability in soil properties within and between sites. Results showed that data fusion captured the soil spatial variability within and between fields, with a predictive ability (test set) to explain up to 88 % of clay and 74 % of SOC stock variability when all mineral soils were embedded in the ANN model. The combination of TC and EC a was particularly effective in explaining texture and SOC heterogeneity within and across fields. In contrast, different responses were observed for single radionuclides, either 238 U, 232 Th, 40 K, or their ratios, within each field, that likely identified site-specific radioisotope enrichment and/or depletion processes. In conclusion, data fusion of EMI and γ-ray detectors accurately predicted soil texture and SOC across soils from alluvial origin.

CATENAVol. 254
University of Udine (IT), University of Padua (IT), Forestry Research Centre (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.