The Influence of Guiding Concept on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Cases: An In Vitro Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (sCAIS) can be performed with different drill guiding systems. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two guiding concepts of sCAIS in partially edentulous cases. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Forty polyamide models of partially edentulous maxillae with seven implantation sites were fabricated. In total, 140 replica implants were placed with keyless (KL) and drill-key (DK) guiding systems using static, full-arch, tooth-supported surgical guides. Three-dimensional crestal and apical, angular and vertical deviations from the planned implant positions were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Intergroup homogeneity of variance homogeneity was examined using Levene's test to assess the precision. <i>Results</i>: Overall median 3D crestal and apical deviations of implants placed in the KL group were significantly higher compared to the DK group (0.86 mm [0.63-0.98] vs. 0.72 mm [0.52-0.89], <i>p</i> = 0.006 and 1.26 [0.98-1.52] vs. 1.13 [0.70-1.45], <i>p</i> = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis, implants placed with a KL system showed higher 3D crestal (<i>p</i> = 0.029), 3D apical (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and angular (<i>p</i> < 0.001) deviations in the extended anterior area, higher 3D crestal (<i>p</i> < 0.001) deviations in the proximal posterior single-tooth gap and higher vertical (<i>p</i> < 0.001) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation. Contrarily, the KL group showed lower 3D crestal (<i>p</i> = 0.007), 3D apical (<i>p</i> < 0.001), angular (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and vertical (<i>p</i> = 0.003) deviations in the distal posterior single-tooth gap, lower 3D apical (<i>p</i> = 0.007) and angular (<i>p</i> = 0.007) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation and lower vertical (<i>p</i> = 0.019) deviations in the proximal site of free-end situation. <i>Conclusions</i>: The deviations of both guiding concepts did not exceed the recommended safety margins. Statistically significant differences in deviations were found between two guiding concepts. Guiding concepts with superior accuracy varied across different sites of implantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040617
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Guiding Concept on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Cases: An In Vitro Study

Ričardas Kubilius, David Kasradze
1 citations
Medicina
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.79
article

The Influence of Guiding Concept on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Cases: An In Vitro Study

Ričardas Kubilius, David Kasradze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (sCAIS) can be performed with different drill guiding systems. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two guiding concepts of sCAIS in partially edentulous cases. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Forty polyamide models of partially edentulous maxillae with seven implantation sites were fabricated. In total, 140 replica implants were placed with keyless (KL) and drill-key (DK) guiding systems using static, full-arch, tooth-supported surgical guides. Three-dimensional crestal and apical, angular and vertical deviations from the planned implant positions were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Intergroup homogeneity of variance homogeneity was examined using Levene's test to assess the precision. <i>Results</i>: Overall median 3D crestal and apical deviations of implants placed in the KL group were significantly higher compared to the DK group (0.86 mm [0.63-0.98] vs. 0.72 mm [0.52-0.89], <i>p</i> = 0.006 and 1.26 [0.98-1.52] vs. 1.13 [0.70-1.45], <i>p</i> = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis, implants placed with a KL system showed higher 3D crestal (<i>p</i> = 0.029), 3D apical (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and angular (<i>p</i> < 0.001) deviations in the extended anterior area, higher 3D crestal (<i>p</i> < 0.001) deviations in the proximal posterior single-tooth gap and higher vertical (<i>p</i> < 0.001) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation. Contrarily, the KL group showed lower 3D crestal (<i>p</i> = 0.007), 3D apical (<i>p</i> < 0.001), angular (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and vertical (<i>p</i> = 0.003) deviations in the distal posterior single-tooth gap, lower 3D apical (<i>p</i> = 0.007) and angular (<i>p</i> = 0.007) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation and lower vertical (<i>p</i> = 0.019) deviations in the proximal site of free-end situation. <i>Conclusions</i>: The deviations of both guiding concepts did not exceed the recommended safety margins. Statistically significant differences in deviations were found between two guiding concepts. Guiding concepts with superior accuracy varied across different sites of implantation.

MedicinaVol. 61(4)
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.