Piriformis-Sparing vs. Conventional Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of the Functional Outcomes

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> The posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely used among surgeons. This study compares dislocation rates and functional outcomes between patients using a piriformis tendon-sparing posterior approach (PSPA) and those using a conventional posterior approach (CPA). <i>Materials and Methods:</i> 350 patients who underwent THA between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, with 163 patients receiving a PSPA and 187 receiving a CPA. Dislocation complication and the functional outcomes including the baseline and postoperative sixth-week pain and Oxford Hip Score, sixth-week Ranawat internal rotation test, and sixth-month acetabular inclination and anteversion angle were recorded. Hospital stay and the duration of surgery were also noted. <i>Results:</i> Implant dislocation occurred in three (1.6%) patients only in the CPA group at six weeks postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.104). No differences were noted in surgery time, baseline and postoperative pain, or hip function (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The Ranawat internal rotation test was positive in 89.6% of the PSPA group and 40.1% of the CPA group at six weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The inclination angle was better in the PSPA group (<i>p</i> = 0.001), but there was no difference in anteversion angle (<i>p</i> = 0.523) at the sixth month postoperatively. The PSPA group had a shorter hospital stay (mean = 2.14 days) compared to the CPA group (mean = 2.47 days) (<i>p</i> = 0.006). <i>Conclusions:</i> The absence of dislocation cases in the piriformis-sparing approach suggests that the preservation of the piriformis tendon, especially in the early period, may have reduced the risk of prosthesis dislocation by increasing joint stability from a clinical perspective. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of the piriformis-sparing posterior approach regarding the dislocation rates and functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040609
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piriformis-Sparing vs. Conventional Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of the Functional Outcomes

Ömer Faruk Bilgen, Gökhan Bayrak, Müren Mutlu, Hakan Zora
1 citations
Medicina
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
article

Piriformis-Sparing vs. Conventional Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of the Functional Outcomes

Ömer Faruk Bilgen, Gökhan Bayrak, Müren Mutlu, Hakan Zora
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> The posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely used among surgeons. This study compares dislocation rates and functional outcomes between patients using a piriformis tendon-sparing posterior approach (PSPA) and those using a conventional posterior approach (CPA). <i>Materials and Methods:</i> 350 patients who underwent THA between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, with 163 patients receiving a PSPA and 187 receiving a CPA. Dislocation complication and the functional outcomes including the baseline and postoperative sixth-week pain and Oxford Hip Score, sixth-week Ranawat internal rotation test, and sixth-month acetabular inclination and anteversion angle were recorded. Hospital stay and the duration of surgery were also noted. <i>Results:</i> Implant dislocation occurred in three (1.6%) patients only in the CPA group at six weeks postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.104). No differences were noted in surgery time, baseline and postoperative pain, or hip function (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The Ranawat internal rotation test was positive in 89.6% of the PSPA group and 40.1% of the CPA group at six weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The inclination angle was better in the PSPA group (<i>p</i> = 0.001), but there was no difference in anteversion angle (<i>p</i> = 0.523) at the sixth month postoperatively. The PSPA group had a shorter hospital stay (mean = 2.14 days) compared to the CPA group (mean = 2.47 days) (<i>p</i> = 0.006). <i>Conclusions:</i> The absence of dislocation cases in the piriformis-sparing approach suggests that the preservation of the piriformis tendon, especially in the early period, may have reduced the risk of prosthesis dislocation by increasing joint stability from a clinical perspective. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of the piriformis-sparing posterior approach regarding the dislocation rates and functional outcomes.

MedicinaVol. 61(4)
Muş Alparslan University (TR), S.B.Ü. Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.