No todo es como lo hemos aprendido

On this occasion I analyze some fundamental oppressions that affect the academic genre indexed as inclusive education. To this end, I maintain that what we know as inclusive education is not such a thing. We only know a pseudoheuristic disguise that imposes the founding paradigms of special education, its didactic and epistemological model to strategically fill in a blank space. What we name through the phrase ‘inclusive education’ is nothing more than a system of arbitrary transliteration of diverse bodies of knowledge, categorical forms and methodological repertoires typical of special education, co-opting defining signs - identity and face - of inclusive education. We are in the presence of a research territory that wanders with great force through various academic structures, ethical commitments and political projects – many of them, of dubious reputation – without knowing who it is. The work concludes by observing that taking special education as inclusive education is making the same mistake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inclusión & Desarrollo
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.inclusion.11.2.2024.45-66
Primary Topic
Educational theories and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No todo es como lo hemos aprendido

Aldo Ocampo González
Inclusión & Desarrollo
Educational theories and practices
article

No todo es como lo hemos aprendido

Aldo Ocampo González
article en

Abstract

On this occasion I analyze some fundamental oppressions that affect the academic genre indexed as inclusive education. To this end, I maintain that what we know as inclusive education is not such a thing. We only know a pseudoheuristic disguise that imposes the founding paradigms of special education, its didactic and epistemological model to strategically fill in a blank space. What we name through the phrase ‘inclusive education’ is nothing more than a system of arbitrary transliteration of diverse bodies of knowledge, categorical forms and methodological repertoires typical of special education, co-opting defining signs - identity and face - of inclusive education. We are in the presence of a research territory that wanders with great force through various academic structures, ethical commitments and political projects – many of them, of dubious reputation – without knowing who it is. The work concludes by observing that taking special education as inclusive education is making the same mistake.

Inclusión & DesarrolloVol. 11(2)
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Educational theories and practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No todo es como lo hemos aprendido — Aldo Ocampo González · Inclusión & Desarrollo (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS