Problems of seizing objects, documents and materials in carrying out open operative-search activities

Introduction. Operative-search and criminal procedural activities are interconnected and focused on crime prevention, suppression and detection. The results of operationalsearch activity can be used in proving criminal cases, if they do not contradict the requirements concerning evidence (Article 89 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation). Part 1 of Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Operative-Search Activities” states that the body carrying out operative-search activities when seizing objects, documents and materials should be guided by criminal procedural legislation, which regulates making a protocol without specifying its type and requirements. This causes problems in the application of criminal procedural legislation in carrying out open operative-search activities. Methods. The methods of scientific cognition were applied: comparative-legal one, complex analysis, generalisation. Results: 1. Part 1 of Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Operative-Search Activities” states that the body carrying out operative-search activities should be guided by criminal procedural legislation regulating the procedure for making a protocol of the investigative action according to the requirements of Articles 166 and 167 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. These articles constitute the evidence specified in Paragraph 5, Part 2, Article 74 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation – the protocol of the investigative action. 2. Making a protocol of seizing objects, documents, materials in carrying out open operative-search activities in accordance with the procedure provided for another criminal procedural or investigative action specified in the titles of Chapters 24-27 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation does not comply with Part 1 of Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Operative-Search Activities” and the current criminal procedural legislation. 3. The protocol of seizure of objects, documents, materials made by the body carrying out open operative-search activities in accordance with the requirements of Articles 166, 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, should include information about the specialist, interpreter and witnesses. 4. Such a protocol of seizure of objects, documents, materials is a part of the operative-search activity. The title of the protocol may correspond to the name of the operative-search activity or have its own title, for example: a) “Protocol of seizure of objects”, b) “Protocol of seizure of documents”, c) “Protocol of seizure of materials”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of the St Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-161-171
Primary Topic
Engineering and Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems of seizing objects, documents and materials in carrying out open operative-search activities

Sergey Vladimirovich Suprun
Vestnik of the St Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Engineering and Environmental Studies
article

Problems of seizing objects, documents and materials in carrying out open operative-search activities

Sergey Vladimirovich Suprun
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Operative-search and criminal procedural activities are interconnected and focused on crime prevention, suppression and detection. The results of operationalsearch activity can be used in proving criminal cases, if they do not contradict the requirements concerning evidence (Article 89 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation). Part 1 of Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Operative-Search Activities” states that the body carrying out operative-search activities when seizing objects, documents and materials should be guided by criminal procedural legislation, which regulates making a protocol without specifying its type and requirements. This causes problems in the application of criminal procedural legislation in carrying out open operative-search activities. Methods. The methods of scientific cognition were applied: comparative-legal one, complex analysis, generalisation. Results: 1. Part 1 of Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Operative-Search Activities” states that the body carrying out operative-search activities should be guided by criminal procedural legislation regulating the procedure for making a protocol of the investigative action according to the requirements of Articles 166 and 167 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. These articles constitute the evidence specified in Paragraph 5, Part 2, Article 74 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation – the protocol of the investigative action. 2. Making a protocol of seizing objects, documents, materials in carrying out open operative-search activities in accordance with the procedure provided for another criminal procedural or investigative action specified in the titles of Chapters 24-27 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation does not comply with Part 1 of Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Operative-Search Activities” and the current criminal procedural legislation. 3. The protocol of seizure of objects, documents, materials made by the body carrying out open operative-search activities in accordance with the requirements of Articles 166, 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, should include information about the specialist, interpreter and witnesses. 4. Such a protocol of seizure of objects, documents, materials is a part of the operative-search activity. The title of the protocol may correspond to the name of the operative-search activity or have its own title, for example: a) “Protocol of seizure of objects”, b) “Protocol of seizure of documents”, c) “Protocol of seizure of materials”.

Vestnik of the St Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of RussiaVol. 2025(1)
Omsk Academy of the Russian Interior Ministry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Engineering and Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.