A Comparative Study of Optimizing Genomic Prediction Accuracy in Commercial Pigs

Genomic prediction (GP), which uses genome-wide markers to estimate breeding values, is a crucial tool for accelerating genetic progress in livestock and plant breeding. The accuracy of GP depends on several factors, including the statistical model, marker density, and cross-validation strategy. This study evaluated these factors to optimize GP accuracy for eight economically important carcass and body traits in a Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) (DLY) pig population. This study used 50 K SNP chip data from 1494 DLY pigs, which were imputed to the whole genome sequence (WGS) level. Seven different models were compared, including GBLUP, ssGBLUP, and five Bayesian models. The ssGBLUP model consistently outperformed other models across all traits, with prediction accuracies ranging from 0.371 to 0.502. Further analyses showed that prediction accuracy improved with increasing cross-validation folds and marker density, particularly in the low-density panel. However, the improvement plateaued in medium-to-high-density scenarios. These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting the model, marker density, and cross-validation strategy to optimize GP accuracy for carcass and body traits in commercial pigs. The insights from this study can guide breeders and researchers in maximizing genetic progress in pig breeding programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15070966
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Optimizing Genomic Prediction Accuracy in Commercial Pigs

Ming Yang, Yiyi Liu, Langqing Liu, Yuling Zhang et al.
2 citations
Animals
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
3.63
article

A Comparative Study of Optimizing Genomic Prediction Accuracy in Commercial Pigs

Ming Yang, Yiyi Liu, Langqing Liu, Yuling Zhang, Enqin Zheng, Menghao Luan, Jinyan Huang, Linsong Dong, Zhanwei Zhuang, Jie Yang, Xiang Zhao, Gengyuan Cai, Jianming Ye, Xiaojian Chen, Zhenfang Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Genomic prediction (GP), which uses genome-wide markers to estimate breeding values, is a crucial tool for accelerating genetic progress in livestock and plant breeding. The accuracy of GP depends on several factors, including the statistical model, marker density, and cross-validation strategy. This study evaluated these factors to optimize GP accuracy for eight economically important carcass and body traits in a Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) (DLY) pig population. This study used 50 K SNP chip data from 1494 DLY pigs, which were imputed to the whole genome sequence (WGS) level. Seven different models were compared, including GBLUP, ssGBLUP, and five Bayesian models. The ssGBLUP model consistently outperformed other models across all traits, with prediction accuracies ranging from 0.371 to 0.502. Further analyses showed that prediction accuracy improved with increasing cross-validation folds and marker density, particularly in the low-density panel. However, the improvement plateaued in medium-to-high-density scenarios. These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting the model, marker density, and cross-validation strategy to optimize GP accuracy for carcass and body traits in commercial pigs. The insights from this study can guide breeders and researchers in maximizing genetic progress in pig breeding programs.

AnimalsVol. 15(7)
South China Agricultural University (CN), Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.