Alternatives to photorespiration: A system-level analysis reveals mechanisms of enhanced plant productivity

Photorespiration causes a substantial decrease in crop yield because of mitochondrial decarboxylation. Alternative pathways (APs) have been designed to relocate the decarboxylation step or even fix additional carbon. To improve the success of transferring those engineered APs from model species to crops, we must understand how they will interact with metabolism and how plant physiology affects their performance. Here, we used multiple mathematical modeling techniques to analyze and compare existing AP designs. We show that carbon-fixing APs are the most promising candidates to replace native photorespiration in major crop species. Our results demonstrate the different metabolic routes that APs use to increase yield and which plant physiology can profit the most from them. We anticipate our results to guide the design of new APs and to help improve existing ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adt9287
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternatives to photorespiration: A system-level analysis reveals mechanisms of enhanced plant productivity

Oliver Ebenhöh, Matthias Heinemann, Andreas P.M. Weber, Marvin van Aalst et al.
15 citations
Science Advances
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
12.09
article

Alternatives to photorespiration: A system-level analysis reveals mechanisms of enhanced plant productivity

Oliver Ebenhöh, Matthias Heinemann, Andreas P.M. Weber, Marvin van Aalst, Edward Smith
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Photorespiration causes a substantial decrease in crop yield because of mitochondrial decarboxylation. Alternative pathways (APs) have been designed to relocate the decarboxylation step or even fix additional carbon. To improve the success of transferring those engineered APs from model species to crops, we must understand how they will interact with metabolism and how plant physiology affects their performance. Here, we used multiple mathematical modeling techniques to analyze and compare existing AP designs. We show that carbon-fixing APs are the most promising candidates to replace native photorespiration in major crop species. Our results demonstrate the different metabolic routes that APs use to increase yield and which plant physiology can profit the most from them. We anticipate our results to guide the design of new APs and to help improve existing ones.

Science AdvancesVol. 11(13)
University of Groningen (NL), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL), Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
12.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.