Non-standard numeral constructions in L2 Russian: A corpus-based study

Aims and Research Questions: The paper investigates variation in numeral constructions in the L2 Russian speech of bilinguals from different regions of Russia. The main research questions are the following: What factors prompt variation in this domain of grammar? Can we argue that non-standard marking is motivated by contact? Methodology: We conduct a corpus-based study of seven varieties of L2 Russian. The corpora contain spontaneous spoken texts collected between the 2000s and 2020s. Data and Analysis: Data from 181 participants born between 1920 and 1997, who are native speakers of 21 languages belonging to four different families, were analyzed based on a number of sociolinguistic and linguistic parameters that were modeled using hierarchical mixed effects logistic regression. Findings/Conclusions: We show that variation in numeral constructions is correlated with the speakers’ level of education and year of birth, the numeral type, and especially with the “collocationality” of numeral-noun combinations. The findings indicate that variation might be motivated by lower L2 proficiency and exposure to the input, but they do not provide strong evidence for contact influence. The negative correlation we found between higher “collocationality” and probability of non-standard marking supports a usage-based view of language acquisition as an experience-driven process in which frequency effects play a central role. Originality: This is the first study to provide a corpus-based analysis of this phenomenon in different varieties of L2 Russian. Implications: The findings have implications for the study of language variation in contact settings, and for the question of whether phenomena that apparently look like the result of pattern borrowing should rather be explained by other sociolinguistic and acquisitional factors that are not necessarily related to contact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bilingualism
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069251323203
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-standard numeral constructions in L2 Russian: A corpus-based study

Chiara Naccarato, George Moroz
2 citations
International Journal of Bilingualism
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
6.89
article

Non-standard numeral constructions in L2 Russian: A corpus-based study

Chiara Naccarato, George Moroz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Aims and Research Questions: The paper investigates variation in numeral constructions in the L2 Russian speech of bilinguals from different regions of Russia. The main research questions are the following: What factors prompt variation in this domain of grammar? Can we argue that non-standard marking is motivated by contact? Methodology: We conduct a corpus-based study of seven varieties of L2 Russian. The corpora contain spontaneous spoken texts collected between the 2000s and 2020s. Data and Analysis: Data from 181 participants born between 1920 and 1997, who are native speakers of 21 languages belonging to four different families, were analyzed based on a number of sociolinguistic and linguistic parameters that were modeled using hierarchical mixed effects logistic regression. Findings/Conclusions: We show that variation in numeral constructions is correlated with the speakers’ level of education and year of birth, the numeral type, and especially with the “collocationality” of numeral-noun combinations. The findings indicate that variation might be motivated by lower L2 proficiency and exposure to the input, but they do not provide strong evidence for contact influence. The negative correlation we found between higher “collocationality” and probability of non-standard marking supports a usage-based view of language acquisition as an experience-driven process in which frequency effects play a central role. Originality: This is the first study to provide a corpus-based analysis of this phenomenon in different varieties of L2 Russian. Implications: The findings have implications for the study of language variation in contact settings, and for the question of whether phenomena that apparently look like the result of pattern borrowing should rather be explained by other sociolinguistic and acquisitional factors that are not necessarily related to contact.

International Journal of BilingualismVol. 30(2)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.