Point-of-Care Ultrasound Pulse Checks During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on a Patient Simulator (PUPRAS)

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), patients must be checked for signs of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be more reliable for detecting the ROSC. We investigated whether a POCUS pulse check algorithm could be used in compliance with the CPR guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: This was a prospective controlled and blinded multicentre manikin study involving staff from two tertiary clinical centres and their emergency medical services. A standard operating procedure for POCUS pulse checks during CPR was evaluated using a simulator in a team of four. The POCUS pulse checks were performed at the central artery following basic and advanced life support. The first pulse check was performed in the setting of pulseless electrical activity, and the second was performed in the presence of ROSC. The participants also completed a questionnaire. <b>Results</b>: A total of 444 pulse checks (244 manual/200 POCUS) were performed in 100 scenarios. The participants comprised physicians (34%), nurses (15%), non-physician emergency medical services personnel (37%), and other medical personnel (14%). The pulse checks took an average of 6.7 s (SD 3.9 s). Manual pulse checks (7.3 s) took longer than ultrasound pulse checks (6.1 s; <i>p</i> < 0.01), which were performed after a mean of 7.1 min (SD 1.7 min), during the fourth rhythm analysis in 93% of cases, and at the femoral artery in 62% of cases. They were rated as "easy" to perform by 77% and "useful" by 94%. <b>Conclusions</b>: POCUS pulse checks basically seem easy to implement and appear to be feasible during CPR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070858
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Pulse Checks During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on a Patient Simulator (PUPRAS)

Tobias Gruebl, Christoph Walter Jänig, Julian Kreutz, Birgit Ploeger et al.
Diagnostics
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Pulse Checks During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on a Patient Simulator (PUPRAS)

Tobias Gruebl, Christoph Walter Jänig, Julian Kreutz, Birgit Ploeger, Karl Matteo Meggiolaro, Susanne Betz, Bernhard Schieffer, Willi Schmidbauer, Andreas Jerrentrup, Harald P Bergmann, Franz Rettich, Stephan Grosch
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), patients must be checked for signs of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be more reliable for detecting the ROSC. We investigated whether a POCUS pulse check algorithm could be used in compliance with the CPR guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: This was a prospective controlled and blinded multicentre manikin study involving staff from two tertiary clinical centres and their emergency medical services. A standard operating procedure for POCUS pulse checks during CPR was evaluated using a simulator in a team of four. The POCUS pulse checks were performed at the central artery following basic and advanced life support. The first pulse check was performed in the setting of pulseless electrical activity, and the second was performed in the presence of ROSC. The participants also completed a questionnaire. <b>Results</b>: A total of 444 pulse checks (244 manual/200 POCUS) were performed in 100 scenarios. The participants comprised physicians (34%), nurses (15%), non-physician emergency medical services personnel (37%), and other medical personnel (14%). The pulse checks took an average of 6.7 s (SD 3.9 s). Manual pulse checks (7.3 s) took longer than ultrasound pulse checks (6.1 s; <i>p</i> < 0.01), which were performed after a mean of 7.1 min (SD 1.7 min), during the fourth rhythm analysis in 93% of cases, and at the femoral artery in 62% of cases. They were rated as "easy" to perform by 77% and "useful" by 94%. <b>Conclusions</b>: POCUS pulse checks basically seem easy to implement and appear to be feasible during CPR.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(7)
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), German Red Cross (DE), Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.