Tracking the citations and applications of RPYS in academic publications: insights from Scopus data

Purpose This study investigates the application and scholarly impact of Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS), a bibliometric technique that identifies historically significant references in scientific fields. By analyzing RPYS citation trends and patterns using Scopus data, the study seeks to understand the frequency and disciplinary impact of RPYS, the document types that cite it most frequently and the defining characteristics of these publications. Design/methodology/approach A structured, four-step retrospective search strategy was used to compile a comprehensive dataset from Scopus. An initial keyword search identified relevant documents, which were refined and expanded by extracting and analyzing author keywords. An advanced search incorporated synonyms and variations of RPYS terms, yielding a final set of 448 documents. Data were analyzed using R Studio and visualization tools like VOSviewer and pyBibx to uncover patterns in RPYS usage across disciplines. Findings RPYS citations demonstrate exponential growth, with the number of citing publications doubling approximately every 2.5 years, surpassing general scientific literature growth rates. Review articles are identified as the most common document type referencing RPYS, with significant impacts in social sciences and decision sciences. Notably, China shows a lower-than-expected representation in RPYS citations. Five prominent research clusters are identified, including research mapping, clinical studies and citation analysis. Practical implications The findings reinforce RPYS as a valuable bibliometric tool for tracing the historical underpinnings of research fields, with implications for its use in interdisciplinary studies and knowledge management. Originality/value This study highlights RPYS’s potential as a bibliometric method, encouraging broader application in scientific research for its unique capability to reveal foundational literature and trends across disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-10-2024-0050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking the citations and applications of RPYS in academic publications: insights from Scopus data

Basharat Ahmad Malik
2 citations
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Research Data Management Practices
6.49
article

Tracking the citations and applications of RPYS in academic publications: insights from Scopus data

Basharat Ahmad Malik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the application and scholarly impact of Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS), a bibliometric technique that identifies historically significant references in scientific fields. By analyzing RPYS citation trends and patterns using Scopus data, the study seeks to understand the frequency and disciplinary impact of RPYS, the document types that cite it most frequently and the defining characteristics of these publications. Design/methodology/approach A structured, four-step retrospective search strategy was used to compile a comprehensive dataset from Scopus. An initial keyword search identified relevant documents, which were refined and expanded by extracting and analyzing author keywords. An advanced search incorporated synonyms and variations of RPYS terms, yielding a final set of 448 documents. Data were analyzed using R Studio and visualization tools like VOSviewer and pyBibx to uncover patterns in RPYS usage across disciplines. Findings RPYS citations demonstrate exponential growth, with the number of citing publications doubling approximately every 2.5 years, surpassing general scientific literature growth rates. Review articles are identified as the most common document type referencing RPYS, with significant impacts in social sciences and decision sciences. Notably, China shows a lower-than-expected representation in RPYS citations. Five prominent research clusters are identified, including research mapping, clinical studies and citation analysis. Practical implications The findings reinforce RPYS as a valuable bibliometric tool for tracing the historical underpinnings of research fields, with implications for its use in interdisciplinary studies and knowledge management. Originality/value This study highlights RPYS’s potential as a bibliometric method, encouraging broader application in scientific research for its unique capability to reveal foundational literature and trends across disciplines.

Performance Measurement and Metrics
Aligarh Muslim University (IN), Department of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Research Data Management Practices
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.