REEVALUATING PRESSURE PEAKS IN PULSE-JET FILTER CLEANING: THE IMPACT OF TIME AVERAGING ON EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT

The performance of pulse-jet filter cleaning systems is often evaluated using peak pressure as a key parameter. This study shows that the sensitivity and sampling rate of data acquisition systems can significantly affect the recorded peak pressure values, leading to potential ambiguities in the evaluation of cleaning performance. Using CFD-based numerical modeling, the effects of acquisition time intervals and time averaging methods on pressure measurements were analyzed. The results show that systems with various sensitivity and sampling rates provide different values of pressure fluctuations, leading to significant deviations in peak pressure values. Time averaging over 10<sup>-3</sup> s also affects the results of the measurement. These findings emphasize the importance of considering instrumentation limitations and disclosing detailed sensor specifications in experimental studies. The objective of this work is to raise awareness among researchers of the need to accurately represent data acquisition parameters and their potential impact on the evaluation of pulse-jet cleaning systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1615/interjenercleanenv.2025057657
Primary Topic
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REEVALUATING PRESSURE PEAKS IN PULSE-JET FILTER CLEANING: THE IMPACT OF TIME AVERAGING ON EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT

Andrey Kuzmin, Valeriya Pinchuk, Andrey Skoromny
International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
article

REEVALUATING PRESSURE PEAKS IN PULSE-JET FILTER CLEANING: THE IMPACT OF TIME AVERAGING ON EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT

Andrey Kuzmin, Valeriya Pinchuk, Andrey Skoromny
article en

Abstract

The performance of pulse-jet filter cleaning systems is often evaluated using peak pressure as a key parameter. This study shows that the sensitivity and sampling rate of data acquisition systems can significantly affect the recorded peak pressure values, leading to potential ambiguities in the evaluation of cleaning performance. Using CFD-based numerical modeling, the effects of acquisition time intervals and time averaging methods on pressure measurements were analyzed. The results show that systems with various sensitivity and sampling rates provide different values of pressure fluctuations, leading to significant deviations in peak pressure values. Time averaging over 10<sup>-3</sup> s also affects the results of the measurement. These findings emphasize the importance of considering instrumentation limitations and disclosing detailed sensor specifications in experimental studies. The objective of this work is to raise awareness among researchers of the need to accurately represent data acquisition parameters and their potential impact on the evaluation of pulse-jet cleaning systems.

International Journal of Energy for a Clean EnvironmentVol. 26(5)
Dnipro University of Technology (UA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

REEVALUATING PRESSURE PEAKS IN PULSE-JET FILTER CLEANING: THE IMPACT OF TIME AVERAGING ON EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT — Andrey Kuzmin, Valeriya Pinchuk, et al. · International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS