The Peculiarities of Foreign Language Learning and Acquisition Processes: Psychological and Linguistic Factors

<p style="text-align: justify;">Context and Relevance. The problem of improving the quality of foreign language teaching remains highly relevant in today's world, as does the analysis of the reasons why it is unsatisfactory. Innovative methods introduced into linguodidactics for teaching foreign languages in schools and universities do not lead to a significant change in the situation. The aim of this study was to analyze data accumulated over the past 50 years on whether it is possible to teach a person a foreign language in an artificially created linguistic environment and how complete and durable the acquired language material will be. Results. Our analysis revealed that researchers lack a unified opinion on the processes and factors influencing language acquisition both in natural conditions and in instructional (artificially created) language environments. In some works, the presence of these two conditions serves as a basis for contrasting the processes implemented therein as “acquisition” and “learning” of a foreign language, with the former, close to the conditions of ontogenetic development of the native language, being considered the only possible way for full mastery of a foreign language, while the latter is viewed as ineffective. This position, held by the authoritative psycholinguist S. Krashen, although subject to criticism, serves as the theoretical and methodological foundation for empirical studies that either confirm the main tenets of his theory or describe methods for partially transforming the artificial language environment and improving the process of “studying” a foreign language. Conclusion. Traditional and modern methods fail to address the task of reliably consolidating foreign language competence at the required level within the educational system.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2025140107
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Peculiarities of Foreign Language Learning and Acquisition Processes: Psychological and Linguistic Factors

Т.V. Ermolova, Aleksandr V. Litvinov, S.M. Makhmudova
2 citations
Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
17.85
article

The Peculiarities of Foreign Language Learning and Acquisition Processes: Psychological and Linguistic Factors

Т.V. Ermolova, Aleksandr V. Litvinov, S.M. Makhmudova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<p style="text-align: justify;">Context and Relevance. The problem of improving the quality of foreign language teaching remains highly relevant in today's world, as does the analysis of the reasons why it is unsatisfactory. Innovative methods introduced into linguodidactics for teaching foreign languages in schools and universities do not lead to a significant change in the situation. The aim of this study was to analyze data accumulated over the past 50 years on whether it is possible to teach a person a foreign language in an artificially created linguistic environment and how complete and durable the acquired language material will be. Results. Our analysis revealed that researchers lack a unified opinion on the processes and factors influencing language acquisition both in natural conditions and in instructional (artificially created) language environments. In some works, the presence of these two conditions serves as a basis for contrasting the processes implemented therein as “acquisition” and “learning” of a foreign language, with the former, close to the conditions of ontogenetic development of the native language, being considered the only possible way for full mastery of a foreign language, while the latter is viewed as ineffective. This position, held by the authoritative psycholinguist S. Krashen, although subject to criticism, serves as the theoretical and methodological foundation for empirical studies that either confirm the main tenets of his theory or describe methods for partially transforming the artificial language environment and improving the process of “studying” a foreign language. Conclusion. Traditional and modern methods fail to address the task of reliably consolidating foreign language competence at the required level within the educational system.</p>

Journal of Modern Foreign PsychologyVol. 14(1)
Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.