No difference in the level of sports activity between single versus dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in adults: a clinical trial

Current evidence on the quality of sports activity in patients younger than 65 following dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is lacking, and whether this coupling allows better performance than single mobility (SM) still needs to be fully clarified. This clinical trial compared sport-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the traditional SM versus DM implants in active patients younger than 65. All THAs were performed using a minimally invasive posterolateral approach, polyethylene liner and ceramic head. All implants were cementless. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores, the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were administered to each patient. Patient assessment was conducted on admission, at 12, and at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. A total of 403 patients were included in the study: 372 SM and 31 DM. The mean age was 56.3 ± 7.2 years. The mean length of the follow-up was 51.3 ± 21.0 months. The present clinical trial found no difference in UCLA, HHS, HAAS, and VAS. Patients returned at a similar level of sports activity in both groups.Level of evidence Level II, prospective group-controlled clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02470-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No difference in the level of sports activity between single versus dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in adults: a clinical trial

Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Ursino, Filippo Maria Anghilieri, Federico Valli et al.
3 citations
European journal of medical research
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
6.02
article

No difference in the level of sports activity between single versus dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in adults: a clinical trial

Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Ursino, Filippo Maria Anghilieri, Federico Valli, Ilaria Mariani, Guido Bandettini, Baldo Arcuri, Riccardo D’Ambrosi, Giovanni Palminteri, Laura Mangiavini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Current evidence on the quality of sports activity in patients younger than 65 following dual mobility (DM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is lacking, and whether this coupling allows better performance than single mobility (SM) still needs to be fully clarified. This clinical trial compared sport-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the traditional SM versus DM implants in active patients younger than 65. All THAs were performed using a minimally invasive posterolateral approach, polyethylene liner and ceramic head. All implants were cementless. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores, the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were administered to each patient. Patient assessment was conducted on admission, at 12, and at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. A total of 403 patients were included in the study: 372 SM and 31 DM. The mean age was 56.3 ± 7.2 years. The mean length of the follow-up was 51.3 ± 21.0 months. The present clinical trial found no difference in UCLA, HHS, HAAS, and VAS. Patients returned at a similar level of sports activity in both groups.Level of evidence Level II, prospective group-controlled clinical trial.

European journal of medical researchVol. 30(1)
University of Milan (IT), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Health & Life (Taiwan) (TW), Link Campus University (IT), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.