A Comparison of First- and Second Order-in-Time Finite Difference Methods Applied to Nonlinear Reactive Transport

In this paper, we consider solution methods for the nonlinear reactive transport equation used to model the protein adsorption process. Efficient methods for simulating this process are necessary to aid in the development of novel adsorptive chromatography media to ensure high-volume production of purified product for the purposes of biotherapeutics. Using MATLAB®, we compare four finite difference schemes used to solve the nonlinear reactive transport equation, focusing on the differences of efficacy between implicit and explicit methods. As such, two of the methods are semi-implicit and two are explicit with one of each kind using a first-order temporal scheme and one of each using a second-order temporal scheme. The semi-implicit methods evaluate almost all terms implicitly while lagging the nonlinear coefficient function in time to linearize the equations. We include numerical results that indicate optimal convergence of the schemes, and we compare the effectiveness of the schemes in matching experimental data using two different boundary conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics Exchange
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33043/28xy39zc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear Materials and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of First- and Second Order-in-Time Finite Difference Methods Applied to Nonlinear Reactive Transport

Kyle J. Hendricks, Anastasia Wilson, Chad Morris, K. Faith Lawrence
1 citations
Mathematics Exchange
Nuclear Materials and Properties
0.52
article

A Comparison of First- and Second Order-in-Time Finite Difference Methods Applied to Nonlinear Reactive Transport

Kyle J. Hendricks, Anastasia Wilson, Chad Morris, K. Faith Lawrence
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we consider solution methods for the nonlinear reactive transport equation used to model the protein adsorption process. Efficient methods for simulating this process are necessary to aid in the development of novel adsorptive chromatography media to ensure high-volume production of purified product for the purposes of biotherapeutics. Using MATLAB®, we compare four finite difference schemes used to solve the nonlinear reactive transport equation, focusing on the differences of efficacy between implicit and explicit methods. As such, two of the methods are semi-implicit and two are explicit with one of each kind using a first-order temporal scheme and one of each using a second-order temporal scheme. The semi-implicit methods evaluate almost all terms implicitly while lagging the nonlinear coefficient function in time to linearize the equations. We include numerical results that indicate optimal convergence of the schemes, and we compare the effectiveness of the schemes in matching experimental data using two different boundary conditions.

Mathematics ExchangeVol. 18(1)
Augusta University Health (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Nuclear Materials and Properties
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison of First- and Second Order-in-Time Finite Difference Methods Applied to Nonlinear Reactive Transport — Kyle J. Hendricks, Anastasia Wilson, et al. · Mathematics Exchange (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS