Shakespearean Families and Ideological Critique in Hill and Rodriguez's Locke & Key Authors

Joe Hill’s and Gabriel Rodriguez’s fantasy/horror comic book series Locke & Key (2008–2013) appropriates the classical psychoanalytic reading of Hamlet in combination with structural elements modeled on The Tempest to mount a critique of the role of families in perpetuating socioeconomic inequalities that strongly resembles the Althusserian critique of ideology, which also extrapolates a model of social subjugation from an Oedipal model of the family. When Hill belatedly attempts to incorporate race into this critique in the issues following Barack Obama’s election and the backlash of white rage, he flounders, largely replicating what Arthur Little identifies as the “white melancholia” that informs much reception of Shakespeare. Following Eve Kosofsky Sedgewick’s model of reparative reading, scholars of appropriation and adaptation can beneficially examine such moments of failure as signs of incomplete reparative work that might be continued by readers and through further adaptation and appropriation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Borrowers and Lenders The Journal of Shakespeare Appropriations
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18274/va9d9s43
Primary Topic
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shakespearean Families and Ideological Critique in Hill and Rodriguez's Locke & Key Authors

Bradley D. Ryner
Borrowers and Lenders The Journal of Shakespeare Appropriations
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
article

Shakespearean Families and Ideological Critique in Hill and Rodriguez's Locke & Key Authors

Bradley D. Ryner
article en

Abstract

Joe Hill’s and Gabriel Rodriguez’s fantasy/horror comic book series Locke & Key (2008–2013) appropriates the classical psychoanalytic reading of Hamlet in combination with structural elements modeled on The Tempest to mount a critique of the role of families in perpetuating socioeconomic inequalities that strongly resembles the Althusserian critique of ideology, which also extrapolates a model of social subjugation from an Oedipal model of the family. When Hill belatedly attempts to incorporate race into this critique in the issues following Barack Obama’s election and the backlash of white rage, he flounders, largely replicating what Arthur Little identifies as the “white melancholia” that informs much reception of Shakespeare. Following Eve Kosofsky Sedgewick’s model of reparative reading, scholars of appropriation and adaptation can beneficially examine such moments of failure as signs of incomplete reparative work that might be continued by readers and through further adaptation and appropriation.

Borrowers and Lenders The Journal of Shakespeare AppropriationsVol. 16(2)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.