An Institutional Review on the Management and Development of Wellness Tourism Resources
Purpose: This study aims to understand the legal system related to wellness tourism through theoretical reviews and comparative analyses. By comparing relevant laws and regulations, this study seeks to derive comparative legal implications. The study aims to provide insights into the institutionalization process for managing and developing wellness tourism resources. Methods: This study theoretically defines the concepts of wellness tourism and wellness tourism resources. Additionally, a comparative legal approach was employed to examine laws and municipal ordinances related to wellness, providing an institutional perspective on wellness tourism resources. Finally, based on these theoretical and institutional analyses, implications and policy recommendations regarding wellness tourism resources were derived. Results: Through an institutional review of wellness tourism resources, differences in the understanding of wellness between laws and ordinances were identified. These differences may hinder the smooth institutionalization of wellness-related policies. Moreover, the legislative process for wellness tourism-related laws was found to be unsystematic, potentially leading to conflicts between different laws or between laws and municipal ordinances. Such inconsistencies may undermine the coherence of the legal framework. Conclusion: This study derived relevant implications and recommendations. The findings of this institutional study on wellness tourism resources can serve as a foundational reference for future policy formulation aimed at promoting wellness tourism. By utilizing these findings, it is expected that a more systematic and efficient management and development of wellness tourism resources can be achieved.
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Convergence Tourism Contents Society
- Published
- 2025-02-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.22556/jctc.2025.11.1.135
- Primary Topic
- Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00