Optimising Electrode Montages in Conventional Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum for Pain Modulation

The cerebellum is involved in pain processing and, therefore, an important target for non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for analgesia. When targeting a brain region for NIBS, it can be difficult to ensure activation of only target regions. Optimal Montages for cerebellar stimulation for pain modulation have not been established. This paper systematically examines cerebellar NIBS Montages by comparing simulated current flow models for targeted conventional cerebellar tDCS and focused high-definition 4 × 1 HD-tDCS, to examine the most effective Montage for targeting only the lobes of the cerebellum. The objective was to explore if slight variations in electrode placement and voltage could be producing confounding activations of other brain regions as shown by the Soterix<sup>®</sup> current modelling software (Ver. 2019). A left deltoid anode for right cerebellar lobe sponge (3 cm lateral to inion) produces the best targeting with conventional tDCS. For high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) a 4 × 1 array based on a 93-electrode EEG map, with the central electrode at PO10, and the array at O2, P8, Ex2, and Ex6, provided focal stimulation. Optimisation of NIBS must include an evaluation of electrode Montages and current flow modelling to determine which structures and pathways will be impacted by the neurostimulation. This approach is essential for future cerebellar NIBS experimental design and will facilitate comparative analysis across different protocols and optimise understanding of the role of the cerebellum in pain processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15040344
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising Electrode Montages in Conventional Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum for Pain Modulation

Alice G. Witney, Adelais Farnell Sharp
Brain Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Optimising Electrode Montages in Conventional Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum for Pain Modulation

Alice G. Witney, Adelais Farnell Sharp
article en

Abstract

The cerebellum is involved in pain processing and, therefore, an important target for non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for analgesia. When targeting a brain region for NIBS, it can be difficult to ensure activation of only target regions. Optimal Montages for cerebellar stimulation for pain modulation have not been established. This paper systematically examines cerebellar NIBS Montages by comparing simulated current flow models for targeted conventional cerebellar tDCS and focused high-definition 4 × 1 HD-tDCS, to examine the most effective Montage for targeting only the lobes of the cerebellum. The objective was to explore if slight variations in electrode placement and voltage could be producing confounding activations of other brain regions as shown by the Soterix<sup>®</sup> current modelling software (Ver. 2019). A left deltoid anode for right cerebellar lobe sponge (3 cm lateral to inion) produces the best targeting with conventional tDCS. For high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) a 4 × 1 array based on a 93-electrode EEG map, with the central electrode at PO10, and the array at O2, P8, Ex2, and Ex6, provided focal stimulation. Optimisation of NIBS must include an evaluation of electrode Montages and current flow modelling to determine which structures and pathways will be impacted by the neurostimulation. This approach is essential for future cerebellar NIBS experimental design and will facilitate comparative analysis across different protocols and optimise understanding of the role of the cerebellum in pain processing.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(4)
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.