Investigation of biogeochemical landfill covers incorporating different biochars and alkaline industrial byproducts for landfill gas mitigation: A column experiment study

Fugitive emissions of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills pose significant environmental risks if not captured. To address this, researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago developed a biogeochemical cover (BGCC) comprising a biochar-amended soil (BAS) layer and a basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag layer to simultaneously mitigate CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Previous laboratory experiments with BGCC comprising pinewood-derived biochar (PW)-amended soil and BOF slag (BGCC-PWBOF) demonstrated substantial potential for CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation. However, reliance on PW biochar and BOF slag may face challenges due to limited availability near landfill site location, which motivated the investigation of BGCC, which consists of different biochar and alkaline materials. Therefore, this study compared two BGCC configurations-one with rice husk biochar and cement kiln dust (BGCC-RHCKD) and another with pinewood biochar and BOF slag (BGCC-PWBOF)-against a conventional soil cover (SC) system in a laboratory column experiment. All three covers were exposed to synthetic landfill gas across four phases with varying CH<sub>4</sub> influx rates. Surface emissions and gas concentrations were continuously monitored. After the experiment, the covers were dismantled, and samples from multiple depths were collected for physico-chemical characterization, microbial community analysis, and batch tests to determine CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation rates and residual carbonation capacity. Results showed that under moderate CH<sub>4</sub> influx rates (20.77-22.80 g CH<sub>4</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>-day) in Phase 1, BGCC-RHCKD and SC achieved peak CH<sub>4</sub> removal efficiencies of 67.3 % and 74.2 %, respectively. The CKD layer in BGCC-RHCKD maintained 100 % CO<sub>2</sub> removal across all phases without breakthrough, whereas BOF slag in BGCC-PWBOF experienced breakthrough after 16-22 days due to desiccation. The highest CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation rates reached 2042.8 μg CH<sub>4</sub>/g-day (BGCC-RHCKD), 455.3 μg CH<sub>4</sub>/g-day (BGCC-PWBOF), and 372.1 μg CH<sub>4</sub>/g-day (SC) and were strongly correlated with the relative abundance of methylotrophic bacteria, especially Methylobacter luteus, in 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiles. Overall, the BGCC-RHCKD system offers an effective solution for mitigating both CH₄ and CO₂ emissions, while the SC system is effective for CH₄ emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179192
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of biogeochemical landfill covers incorporating different biochars and alkaline industrial byproducts for landfill gas mitigation: A column experiment study

Krishna R. Reddy, Stefan J. Green, Gaurav Verma
4 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
3.99
article

Investigation of biogeochemical landfill covers incorporating different biochars and alkaline industrial byproducts for landfill gas mitigation: A column experiment study

Krishna R. Reddy, Stefan J. Green, Gaurav Verma
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Fugitive emissions of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills pose significant environmental risks if not captured. To address this, researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago developed a biogeochemical cover (BGCC) comprising a biochar-amended soil (BAS) layer and a basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag layer to simultaneously mitigate CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Previous laboratory experiments with BGCC comprising pinewood-derived biochar (PW)-amended soil and BOF slag (BGCC-PWBOF) demonstrated substantial potential for CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation. However, reliance on PW biochar and BOF slag may face challenges due to limited availability near landfill site location, which motivated the investigation of BGCC, which consists of different biochar and alkaline materials. Therefore, this study compared two BGCC configurations-one with rice husk biochar and cement kiln dust (BGCC-RHCKD) and another with pinewood biochar and BOF slag (BGCC-PWBOF)-against a conventional soil cover (SC) system in a laboratory column experiment. All three covers were exposed to synthetic landfill gas across four phases with varying CH<sub>4</sub> influx rates. Surface emissions and gas concentrations were continuously monitored. After the experiment, the covers were dismantled, and samples from multiple depths were collected for physico-chemical characterization, microbial community analysis, and batch tests to determine CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation rates and residual carbonation capacity. Results showed that under moderate CH<sub>4</sub> influx rates (20.77-22.80 g CH<sub>4</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>-day) in Phase 1, BGCC-RHCKD and SC achieved peak CH<sub>4</sub> removal efficiencies of 67.3 % and 74.2 %, respectively. The CKD layer in BGCC-RHCKD maintained 100 % CO<sub>2</sub> removal across all phases without breakthrough, whereas BOF slag in BGCC-PWBOF experienced breakthrough after 16-22 days due to desiccation. The highest CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation rates reached 2042.8 μg CH<sub>4</sub>/g-day (BGCC-RHCKD), 455.3 μg CH<sub>4</sub>/g-day (BGCC-PWBOF), and 372.1 μg CH<sub>4</sub>/g-day (SC) and were strongly correlated with the relative abundance of methylotrophic bacteria, especially Methylobacter luteus, in 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiles. Overall, the BGCC-RHCKD system offers an effective solution for mitigating both CH₄ and CO₂ emissions, while the SC system is effective for CH₄ emissions.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 974
Rush University Medical Center (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
3.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.