Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Blue Lupin and White Lupin Protein Isolates

White lupin (WLPI) and blue lupin (BLPI) protein isolates were compared for their composition and functional properties. WLPI showed a higher protein yield (70.30%) than BLPI (66.47%), while BLPI had a slightly higher crude protein content (86.96%). Both isolates had similar essential amino acid profiles, with sulfur-containing amino acids valine and lysine being limiting. WLPI flour exhibited larger particle sizes (D4,3 of 29.3 μm) and a higher denaturation temperature (100 °C) than BLPI (D4,3 of 19.5 μm and 89 °C, respectively). However, BLPI demonstrated a higher surface hydrophobicity (688.13 arbitrary units) than WLPI (656.77 arbitrary units). WLPI showed superior in vitro protein digestibility (84.21%) and an oil-holding capacity (8.18 g/g). Analysis of sulfhydryl groups revealed higher free SH content in WLPI (27.22 μmol/g), while BLPI had a higher total SH (86.11 μmol/g) and disulfide bond content (29.44 μmol/g). These differences in the structural and physicochemical properties between WLPI and BLPI may significantly influence functional behavior in various food systems, potentially affecting their applications in food formulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Food Science & Technology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00877
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Botanical Research and Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Blue Lupin and White Lupin Protein Isolates

Stanley Chukwuejim, Rotimi E. Aluko
10 citations
ACS Food Science & Technology
Botanical Research and Chemistry
30.27
article

Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Blue Lupin and White Lupin Protein Isolates

Stanley Chukwuejim, Rotimi E. Aluko
article en
10 citations

Abstract

White lupin (WLPI) and blue lupin (BLPI) protein isolates were compared for their composition and functional properties. WLPI showed a higher protein yield (70.30%) than BLPI (66.47%), while BLPI had a slightly higher crude protein content (86.96%). Both isolates had similar essential amino acid profiles, with sulfur-containing amino acids valine and lysine being limiting. WLPI flour exhibited larger particle sizes (D4,3 of 29.3 μm) and a higher denaturation temperature (100 °C) than BLPI (D4,3 of 19.5 μm and 89 °C, respectively). However, BLPI demonstrated a higher surface hydrophobicity (688.13 arbitrary units) than WLPI (656.77 arbitrary units). WLPI showed superior in vitro protein digestibility (84.21%) and an oil-holding capacity (8.18 g/g). Analysis of sulfhydryl groups revealed higher free SH content in WLPI (27.22 μmol/g), while BLPI had a higher total SH (86.11 μmol/g) and disulfide bond content (29.44 μmol/g). These differences in the structural and physicochemical properties between WLPI and BLPI may significantly influence functional behavior in various food systems, potentially affecting their applications in food formulations.

ACS Food Science & TechnologyVol. 5(4)
University of Manitoba (CA)
University of Manitoba, Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Botanical Research and Chemistry
30.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.