From the 2001 Evidence Regulation to its 2020 Recast

When courts of EU Member States have to take evidence in other Member States in the context of a civil or commercial procedure, they can rely on the 2020 Evidence Regulation. This instrument is the recast of the 2001 Evidence Regulation, and it provides two different paths for courts to take evidence abroad. One consists of a court asking a court in another Member State to take evidence on its behalf. This is the so-called indirect taking of evidence system. Alternatively, courts also have the possibility of directly taking the evidence located in another Member State. In broad terms, the 2020 Evidence Regulation has retained the main structure and content of the 2001 Evidence Regulation. However, it has introduced some innovations, such as the future mandatory use of electronic communications between the courts and authorities involved in the application of this instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2025.9348
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the 2001 Evidence Regulation to its 2020 Recast

Carlos Santaló Goris
CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

From the 2001 Evidence Regulation to its 2020 Recast

Carlos Santaló Goris
article en

Abstract

When courts of EU Member States have to take evidence in other Member States in the context of a civil or commercial procedure, they can rely on the 2020 Evidence Regulation. This instrument is the recast of the 2001 Evidence Regulation, and it provides two different paths for courts to take evidence abroad. One consists of a court asking a court in another Member State to take evidence on its behalf. This is the so-called indirect taking of evidence system. Alternatively, courts also have the possibility of directly taking the evidence located in another Member State. In broad terms, the 2020 Evidence Regulation has retained the main structure and content of the 2001 Evidence Regulation. However, it has introduced some innovations, such as the future mandatory use of electronic communications between the courts and authorities involved in the application of this instrument.

CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONALVol. 17(1)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.