Dimensions of Social-Emotional Health in Female and Male Students and Their Stress Coping Strategies

Introduction: Students experience elevated levels of stress. According to the covitality-based model of their social-emotional health, its dimensions include psychological “strengths” that contribute to shaping well-being and managing stress transactions. Research Aim: The aim of the study was to identify differences and similarities in the level of psychological “strengths” between female and male students and to determine their relationship with the coping strategies they employ to deal with stress. Research Method: The study utilized a diagnostic survey method and the CAWI (computer-assisted web interviewing) technique. The research material was collected using the Mini-COPE Inventory for Measuring Coping with Stress by Carver, adapted by Juczyński and Ogińska-Bulik, and the Social-Emotional Health Survey (SEHS) by Furlong in its version for higher education. The data analysis procedure included descriptive statistics and inferential statistical methods. Results: The dimensions of students’ social-emotional health were found to be at a medium level. The self-belief dimension scored significantly higher in male students, while the belief in others was found to be higher in female students. Among females, correlations were observed between engagement in life and the strategy of positive reappraisal, the emotional component of health and positive reappraisal, as well as self-belief and active coping. Among males, engagement in life correlated with the strategy of behavioral disengagement. Predictors of students’ psychological strengths included strategies such as positive reappraisal, acceptance, behavioral disengagement, self-blame, use of psychoactive substances, and humor. Positive reappraisal, seeking emotional support, active coping, and turning to religion were found to be predictors of health dimensions among females. Conclusions: Gender differences were identified in terms of the level of development of social-emotional dimensions of health and their relationship with the stress coping strategies adopted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2025.44.1.105-122
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensions of Social-Emotional Health in Female and Male Students and Their Stress Coping Strategies

Barbara Ostafińska-Molik, Anna Gaweł
Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Dimensions of Social-Emotional Health in Female and Male Students and Their Stress Coping Strategies

Barbara Ostafińska-Molik, Anna Gaweł
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Students experience elevated levels of stress. According to the covitality-based model of their social-emotional health, its dimensions include psychological “strengths” that contribute to shaping well-being and managing stress transactions. Research Aim: The aim of the study was to identify differences and similarities in the level of psychological “strengths” between female and male students and to determine their relationship with the coping strategies they employ to deal with stress. Research Method: The study utilized a diagnostic survey method and the CAWI (computer-assisted web interviewing) technique. The research material was collected using the Mini-COPE Inventory for Measuring Coping with Stress by Carver, adapted by Juczyński and Ogińska-Bulik, and the Social-Emotional Health Survey (SEHS) by Furlong in its version for higher education. The data analysis procedure included descriptive statistics and inferential statistical methods. Results: The dimensions of students’ social-emotional health were found to be at a medium level. The self-belief dimension scored significantly higher in male students, while the belief in others was found to be higher in female students. Among females, correlations were observed between engagement in life and the strategy of positive reappraisal, the emotional component of health and positive reappraisal, as well as self-belief and active coping. Among males, engagement in life correlated with the strategy of behavioral disengagement. Predictors of students’ psychological strengths included strategies such as positive reappraisal, acceptance, behavioral disengagement, self-blame, use of psychoactive substances, and humor. Positive reappraisal, seeking emotional support, active coping, and turning to religion were found to be predictors of health dimensions among females. Conclusions: Gender differences were identified in terms of the level of development of social-emotional dimensions of health and their relationship with the stress coping strategies adopted.

Lubelski Rocznik PedagogicznyVol. 44(1)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dimensions of Social-Emotional Health in Female and Male Students and Their Stress Coping Strategies — Barbara Ostafińska-Molik, Anna Gaweł · Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS