Prey type and prey size selection in a Eurasian oystercatcher population at the edge of its distribution range

This study targeted prey type and prey size selection by a small but expanding population of the Eurasian oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) at the southernmost range of its European distribution (Galicia, NW Spain). We compared consumption and availability of prey items delivered to chicks. Consumption was studied through piles of discarded shells and availability was sampled in the foraging grounds located around nesting sites on three different islets. The only two prey types present in shell piles were mussels (Mytillus galloprovincialis) and limpets (Patella sp.). Our chi-square analyses did not detect any prey type selection by oystercatchers, but the use of the Savage index with Manly’s method identified negative selection of limpets at one of the study sites. As a rule, the birds consumed limpets and mussels in proportion to their availability in their foraging grounds. At one of the study sites periwinkles (Littorina sp.) were present but not consumed. Regarding prey size, oystercatchers selected (1) mussels that were either similar to or larger than those available, and (2) limpets that were larger than those available. However, at one site out of three, the oystercatchers positively selected limpets of smaller size than those available. Hence, our results showed some heterogeneity among sites regarding prey type selection, but quite a consistent pattern of selection of larger prey. We suggest that oystercatcher foraging ecology is not explained solely by considering the balance between energy uptake and costs, but importantly by introducing additional variables such as the risk of chick predation, and current nesting as refugees on islets with no access to mainland beaches and sand dunes for breeding, where both adult and chick diet could be substantially different.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Marina
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05550.093
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prey type and prey size selection in a Eurasian oystercatcher population at the edge of its distribution range

Juan Rodríguez-Silvar, Alejandro Martínez‐Abraín, Jorge Mouriño, Andrés Bermejo et al.
Scientia Marina
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Prey type and prey size selection in a Eurasian oystercatcher population at the edge of its distribution range

Juan Rodríguez-Silvar, Alejandro Martínez‐Abraín, Jorge Mouriño, Andrés Bermejo, Nicolás Ron Arroyo
article en

Abstract

This study targeted prey type and prey size selection by a small but expanding population of the Eurasian oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) at the southernmost range of its European distribution (Galicia, NW Spain). We compared consumption and availability of prey items delivered to chicks. Consumption was studied through piles of discarded shells and availability was sampled in the foraging grounds located around nesting sites on three different islets. The only two prey types present in shell piles were mussels (Mytillus galloprovincialis) and limpets (Patella sp.). Our chi-square analyses did not detect any prey type selection by oystercatchers, but the use of the Savage index with Manly’s method identified negative selection of limpets at one of the study sites. As a rule, the birds consumed limpets and mussels in proportion to their availability in their foraging grounds. At one of the study sites periwinkles (Littorina sp.) were present but not consumed. Regarding prey size, oystercatchers selected (1) mussels that were either similar to or larger than those available, and (2) limpets that were larger than those available. However, at one site out of three, the oystercatchers positively selected limpets of smaller size than those available. Hence, our results showed some heterogeneity among sites regarding prey type selection, but quite a consistent pattern of selection of larger prey. We suggest that oystercatcher foraging ecology is not explained solely by considering the balance between energy uptake and costs, but importantly by introducing additional variables such as the risk of chick predation, and current nesting as refugees on islets with no access to mainland beaches and sand dunes for breeding, where both adult and chick diet could be substantially different.

Scientia MarinaVol. 89(1)
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Arcadis (United States) (US), Museo de Historia Natural
Xunta de Galicia
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.