Abortion From A Right-To-Choice Perspective: Contributions From Comparative Jurisprudence And Public Policy

The purpose of the study was to expose the way in which comparative jurisprudence and public policies have accepted abortion on the basis of the right to decide. From a qualitative approach, of a basic type and with a grounded theory design, and applying the documentary source analysis technique in a systematic, hermeneutic and critical way, it is hypothesized that the right to decide has become a human right that allows people to assume, in certain circumstances, important decisions with social, legal, ethical and political repercussions, as in this case, the decision to have an abortion. Thus, the discussion on this issue goes beyond the entrapment of restrictive positions of rights. Along these lines, in several countries the discussion and possibility of regulating this figure has been opened in the understanding that human freedom, a fundamental aspect of the right to decide, continues to be an aspiration that sustains any norm or position that goes against it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2738
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abortion From A Right-To-Choice Perspective: Contributions From Comparative Jurisprudence And Public Policy

Marco Ramírez Casusol
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Abortion From A Right-To-Choice Perspective: Contributions From Comparative Jurisprudence And Public Policy

Marco Ramírez Casusol
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to expose the way in which comparative jurisprudence and public policies have accepted abortion on the basis of the right to decide. From a qualitative approach, of a basic type and with a grounded theory design, and applying the documentary source analysis technique in a systematic, hermeneutic and critical way, it is hypothesized that the right to decide has become a human right that allows people to assume, in certain circumstances, important decisions with social, legal, ethical and political repercussions, as in this case, the decision to have an abortion. Thus, the discussion on this issue goes beyond the entrapment of restrictive positions of rights. Along these lines, in several countries the discussion and possibility of regulating this figure has been opened in the understanding that human freedom, a fundamental aspect of the right to decide, continues to be an aspiration that sustains any norm or position that goes against it.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(9S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.