Trends in Open Versus Minimally Invasive Craniosynostosis Repair: A 10-Year National Analysis
The prevalence of MIS for craniosynostosis repair increased over a 10-year period. MIS patients benefit from reduced complication rates, operative time, anesthesia duration, and length of stay. As MIS becomes a more common treatment modality for craniosynostosis, access has expanded to include more complex and diverse patients, though opportunities for improvement still remain.
Authors
- J. Scott Roth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-7220)
- Peter J. Taub (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6740-6684)
- Peter Morgenstern (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2409-3614)
- Ethan Fung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-0865)
- Bo Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-8567)
- Sabrina Shih (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-7127)
- Maxwell Godek
Institutions
- Center For Reconstructive Urethral Surgery (IT)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Published
- 2025-03-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011306
- Primary Topic
- Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00