Organization of Prenatal Care in Orofacial Clefts and Suspected Robin Sequence: A European Survey

Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000011312
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organization of Prenatal Care in Orofacial Clefts and Suspected Robin Sequence: A European Survey

Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, P Scheffer, Shirley van de Velde, Christine L. van Velzen
1 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.82
article

Organization of Prenatal Care in Orofacial Clefts and Suspected Robin Sequence: A European Survey

Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, P Scheffer, Shirley van de Velde, Christine L. van Velzen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(8)
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Temple Street Children's University Hospital (IE), CITIC Group (China) (CN), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.