Individual- and Group-Level Disparities Between Racial and Ethnic Groups in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria

This comparative effectiveness study of lung cancer screening eligibility suggests that screening eligibility criteria cannot result in both equal eligibility for all individuals with the same benefit and equal program sensitivity for each race and ethnicity. In general, race- and ethnicity-specific thresholds that result in equal group-level sensitivity on 1 metric cannot result in equal sensitivities on other metrics. Thus, only 1 metric can be equalized, requiring a value judgment on which to prioritize.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2172
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual- and Group-Level Disparities Between Racial and Ethnic Groups in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria

Hormuzd A. Katki, Melinda C. Aldrich, Anil K. Chaturvedi, Corey D. Young et al.
6 citations
JAMA Network Open
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
9.11
article

Individual- and Group-Level Disparities Between Racial and Ethnic Groups in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria

Hormuzd A. Katki, Melinda C. Aldrich, Anil K. Chaturvedi, Corey D. Young, Jeffrey D. Blume, Li C. Cheung, M. Patricia Rivera, Rebecca Landy, Hilary A. Robbins
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This comparative effectiveness study of lung cancer screening eligibility suggests that screening eligibility criteria cannot result in both equal eligibility for all individuals with the same benefit and equal program sensitivity for each race and ethnicity. In general, race- and ethnicity-specific thresholds that result in equal group-level sensitivity on 1 metric cannot result in equal sensitivities on other metrics. Thus, only 1 metric can be equalized, requiring a value judgment on which to prioritize.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 8(3)
National Institutes of Health (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR), University of Virginia (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
9.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.