AutoFRS: an externally validated, annotation-free approach to computational preoperative complication risk stratification in pancreatic surgery – an experimental study

Background: The risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), one of the most dreaded complications after pancreatic surgery, can be predicted from preoperative imaging and tabular clinical routine data. However, existing studies suffer from limited clinical applicability due to a need for manual data annotation and a lack of external validation. We propose AutoFRS (automated fistula risk score software), an externally validated end-to-end prediction tool for POPF risk stratification based on multimodal preoperative data. Materials and methods: We trained AutoFRS on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging and clinical data from 108 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection and validated it on an external cohort of 61 patients. Prediction performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy. In addition, model performance was compared to the updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS), the current clinical gold standard method for intraoperative POPF risk stratification. Results: AutoFRS achieved an AUC of 0.81 and a balanced accuracy of 0.72 in internal validation and an AUC of 0.79 and a balanced accuracy of 0.70 in external validation. In a patient subset with documented intraoperative POPF risk factors, AutoFRS (AUC: 0.84 ± 0.05) performed on par with the uaFRS (AUC: 0.85 ± 0.06). The AutoFRS web application facilitates annotation-free prediction of POPF from preoperative imaging and clinical data based on the AutoFRS prediction model. Conclusion: POPF can be predicted from multimodal clinical routine data without human data annotation, automating the risk prediction process. We provide additional evidence of the clinical feasibility of preoperative POPF risk stratification and introduce a software pipeline for future prospective evaluation. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000002327
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AutoFRS: an externally validated, annotation-free approach to computational preoperative complication risk stratification in pancreatic surgery – an experimental study

Nithya Bhasker, Stefanie Speidel, Nadiia Skorobohach, Jürgen Weitz et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.05
article

AutoFRS: an externally validated, annotation-free approach to computational preoperative complication risk stratification in pancreatic surgery – an experimental study

Nithya Bhasker, Stefanie Speidel, Nadiia Skorobohach, Jürgen Weitz, Pascal Probst, Marius Distler, Beat Müller, Rosa Klotz, Martin Wagner, Sebastian Bodenstedt, Ralf‐Thorsten Hoffmann, Sebastian Hempel, Fiona R. Kolbinger, Steffen Löck, Jens‐Peter Kühn, Felix Schön, Alex Zwanenburg, A. Schulze, Hanna Maria Schmeiser, Daniel Cser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), one of the most dreaded complications after pancreatic surgery, can be predicted from preoperative imaging and tabular clinical routine data. However, existing studies suffer from limited clinical applicability due to a need for manual data annotation and a lack of external validation. We propose AutoFRS (automated fistula risk score software), an externally validated end-to-end prediction tool for POPF risk stratification based on multimodal preoperative data. Materials and methods: We trained AutoFRS on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging and clinical data from 108 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection and validated it on an external cohort of 61 patients. Prediction performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy. In addition, model performance was compared to the updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS), the current clinical gold standard method for intraoperative POPF risk stratification. Results: AutoFRS achieved an AUC of 0.81 and a balanced accuracy of 0.72 in internal validation and an AUC of 0.79 and a balanced accuracy of 0.70 in external validation. In a patient subset with documented intraoperative POPF risk factors, AutoFRS (AUC: 0.84 ± 0.05) performed on par with the uaFRS (AUC: 0.85 ± 0.06). The AutoFRS web application facilitates annotation-free prediction of POPF from preoperative imaging and clinical data based on the AutoFRS prediction model. Conclusion: POPF can be predicted from multimodal clinical routine data without human data annotation, automating the risk prediction process. We provide additional evidence of the clinical feasibility of preoperative POPF risk stratification and introduce a software pipeline for future prospective evaluation. Graphical Abstract

International Journal of SurgeryVol. 111(5)
Regenstrief Institute (US), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Heidelberg University (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Hospital of Basel (CH), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), OncoRay (DE), Spital Thurgau (Switzerland) (CH), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.