What Factors Have Been the Most Helpful and Harmful and When? Identifying Key Impacts on Psychosocial Development According to Autistic Adults and Caregivers

Few studies have asked autistic adults and caregivers directly about what has most positively and negatively impacted their lives. This study sought to: (a) identify positive and negative factors experienced by autistic adults and caregivers; (b) test for within-subject differences in endorsement of promotive factors reported specific to four stages of development; and (c) test for differences in factors between adults with varying cognitive ability (i.e., less cognitively able [LCA; verbal IQ < 70] and more cognitively able [MCA; verbal IQ ≥ 70]). Participants included 91 autistic adults and caregivers. Autistic adults' VIQs ranged from 4 to 139. Participants completed a modified version of the Social/Emotional Functioning Interview which consists of open-ended questions about positive and negative factors experienced across development. Autistic adults and caregivers, regardless of cognitive abilities, frequently reported people supports as more helpful than specific services, aspects of education, or generative activities from early childhood through adulthood. For both cognitive groups, generative activities were increasingly important after childhood. Services were more frequently identified as helpful by LCA caregivers in adulthood, while education was reported more by MCA caregivers and autistic adults. Differences by cognitive ability in negative factors included that more LCA caregivers reported poorly prepared professionals/caregivers as disruptive, while more MCA caregivers and autistic adults reported family conflict and bullying. Positive and negative factors identified through interviews of lived experiences can inform targeted care based on strengths and needs across cognitive abilities and life stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-025-06800-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Factors Have Been the Most Helpful and Harmful and When? Identifying Key Impacts on Psychosocial Development According to Autistic Adults and Caregivers

Hillary K. Schiltz, Juliette Lerner, Sonja Ziegler, Catherine Lord et al.
2 citations
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
2.86
article

What Factors Have Been the Most Helpful and Harmful and When? Identifying Key Impacts on Psychosocial Development According to Autistic Adults and Caregivers

Hillary K. Schiltz, Juliette Lerner, Sonja Ziegler, Catherine Lord, Noa Schisterman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Few studies have asked autistic adults and caregivers directly about what has most positively and negatively impacted their lives. This study sought to: (a) identify positive and negative factors experienced by autistic adults and caregivers; (b) test for within-subject differences in endorsement of promotive factors reported specific to four stages of development; and (c) test for differences in factors between adults with varying cognitive ability (i.e., less cognitively able [LCA; verbal IQ < 70] and more cognitively able [MCA; verbal IQ ≥ 70]). Participants included 91 autistic adults and caregivers. Autistic adults' VIQs ranged from 4 to 139. Participants completed a modified version of the Social/Emotional Functioning Interview which consists of open-ended questions about positive and negative factors experienced across development. Autistic adults and caregivers, regardless of cognitive abilities, frequently reported people supports as more helpful than specific services, aspects of education, or generative activities from early childhood through adulthood. For both cognitive groups, generative activities were increasingly important after childhood. Services were more frequently identified as helpful by LCA caregivers in adulthood, while education was reported more by MCA caregivers and autistic adults. Differences by cognitive ability in negative factors included that more LCA caregivers reported poorly prepared professionals/caregivers as disruptive, while more MCA caregivers and autistic adults reported family conflict and bullying. Positive and negative factors identified through interviews of lived experiences can inform targeted care based on strengths and needs across cognitive abilities and life stages.

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
University of Southern California (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Washington (US), Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
National Institute of Mental Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.