Implications of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to Company Network Collaboration

This paper examines the collaborative dynamics within a European cruise shipbuilding company network, with a particular focus on sustainable development (SD) initiatives and compliance with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Shipbuilding is characterized by highly complex supplier networks, posing challenges for CSRD implementation, particularly in reporting indirect (Scope 3) greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) across the value chain. The mandatory inclusion of Scope 3 emissions requires companies to account for previously overlooked activities, posing significant resource demands due to the complexity of global supply chains. The findings highlight challenges in the preparedness of case companies for CSRD-compliant Scope 3 emissions reporting, particularly regarding necessary operational and collaborative changes. Network analysis reveals that the case company network is loosely connected, with limited interorganizational SD initiatives. While the lead company occupies a central position in advancing sustainability efforts, the overall network structure exhibits weak coordination. Despite a social framework that facilitates information exchange, the network demonstrates limited capacity to leverage collective resources for integrated reporting, development, and innovation. The findings suggest that a more open and balanced network structure, coupled with coordinated collaboration, is essential for effectively addressing CSRD requirements. Strengthening transparency, fostering commitment, and enhancing joint SD initiatives may provide strategic advantages and contribute to long-term business sustainability and renewal.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainability Research
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to Company Network Collaboration

1 citations
Journal of Sustainability Research
Regulation and Compliance Studies
2.23
article

Implications of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to Company Network Collaboration

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the collaborative dynamics within a European cruise shipbuilding company network, with a particular focus on sustainable development (SD) initiatives and compliance with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Shipbuilding is characterized by highly complex supplier networks, posing challenges for CSRD implementation, particularly in reporting indirect (Scope 3) greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) across the value chain. The mandatory inclusion of Scope 3 emissions requires companies to account for previously overlooked activities, posing significant resource demands due to the complexity of global supply chains. The findings highlight challenges in the preparedness of case companies for CSRD-compliant Scope 3 emissions reporting, particularly regarding necessary operational and collaborative changes. Network analysis reveals that the case company network is loosely connected, with limited interorganizational SD initiatives. While the lead company occupies a central position in advancing sustainability efforts, the overall network structure exhibits weak coordination. Despite a social framework that facilitates information exchange, the network demonstrates limited capacity to leverage collective resources for integrated reporting, development, and innovation. The findings suggest that a more open and balanced network structure, coupled with coordinated collaboration, is essential for effectively addressing CSRD requirements. Strengthening transparency, fostering commitment, and enhancing joint SD initiatives may provide strategic advantages and contribute to long-term business sustainability and renewal.

Journal of Sustainability ResearchVol. 7(1)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.