Gloss on the Judgment of the Higher Court of Lawyers (Anwaltsgerichtshof) of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia of 11 November 2015, Case 1 AGH 23/15

The gloss refers to a judgment of the Higher Court of Lawyers (Anwaltsgerichtshof) of North Rhine-Westphalia Land of 11 November 2015 (1 AGH 23/15), in which the Court ruled upon the decision of a bar association to revoke the permission to use the professional title of “Fachanwalt” (specialist lawyer) due to a breach of the professional obligation to undergo compulsory continuing professional development. The Court correctly recognized that, firstly, the Bar had made its decision on the wrong basis and, secondly, that there was nevertheless no reduction of its discretion to zero, since despite the existence of the reason for revocation – at least in this specific case – discretion still had to be exercised by the Bar. In this way, the Court corrected the Bar’s doubly erroneous decision. The law applicable in this case has been reformed since the decision with the aim of harmonizing the way the bars use their discretion by issuing decisions concerning the revocation of permissions to use the title “Fachanwalt” – the harshest sanction in this context. By these means, erroneous decisions such as the one at hand shall be minimized. However, the new regulation is also fraught with uncertainty and the extent to which it will provide a remedy will only be- come apparent with time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/spp.2025.1.49.9
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gloss on the Judgment of the Higher Court of Lawyers (Anwaltsgerichtshof) of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia of 11 November 2015, Case 1 AGH 23/15

Eva-Maria Thierjung
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Gloss on the Judgment of the Higher Court of Lawyers (Anwaltsgerichtshof) of the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia of 11 November 2015, Case 1 AGH 23/15

Eva-Maria Thierjung
article en

Abstract

The gloss refers to a judgment of the Higher Court of Lawyers (Anwaltsgerichtshof) of North Rhine-Westphalia Land of 11 November 2015 (1 AGH 23/15), in which the Court ruled upon the decision of a bar association to revoke the permission to use the professional title of “Fachanwalt” (specialist lawyer) due to a breach of the professional obligation to undergo compulsory continuing professional development. The Court correctly recognized that, firstly, the Bar had made its decision on the wrong basis and, secondly, that there was nevertheless no reduction of its discretion to zero, since despite the existence of the reason for revocation – at least in this specific case – discretion still had to be exercised by the Bar. In this way, the Court corrected the Bar’s doubly erroneous decision. The law applicable in this case has been reformed since the decision with the aim of harmonizing the way the bars use their discretion by issuing decisions concerning the revocation of permissions to use the title “Fachanwalt” – the harshest sanction in this context. By these means, erroneous decisions such as the one at hand shall be minimized. However, the new regulation is also fraught with uncertainty and the extent to which it will provide a remedy will only be- come apparent with time.

Studia Prawa Publicznego(1 (49))
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.