Automation for digital forensics: Towards a classification model for the community

The current state of automation in digital forensics remains insufficiently defined. While the complexity of automated tools and methods has evolved significantly (e.g., from basic parsers to the integration of advanced techniques), it remains challenging to pinpoint the field’s overall progress or compare methods. A first step towards a solution was the work ‘Automation for digital forensics: Towards a definition for the community’ which defines automation but cannot categorize various methods. This work aims to address this gap and presents a first classification model for automation for digital forensics. Therefore, we analyzed automation classification schemes from different disciplines (e.g., cars) and assessed various model possibilities as well as characteristics. We conclude that a 2-dimensional model with the axis ‘decision’ and ‘level of automation’ is most appropriate and provide an overview table with examples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3712716.3712725
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automation for digital forensics: Towards a classification model for the community

Frank Breitinger, Gaëtan Michelet
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Automation for digital forensics: Towards a classification model for the community

Frank Breitinger, Gaëtan Michelet
article en

Abstract

The current state of automation in digital forensics remains insufficiently defined. While the complexity of automated tools and methods has evolved significantly (e.g., from basic parsers to the integration of advanced techniques), it remains challenging to pinpoint the field’s overall progress or compare methods. A first step towards a solution was the work ‘Automation for digital forensics: Towards a definition for the community’ which defines automation but cannot categorize various methods. This work aims to address this gap and presents a first classification model for automation for digital forensics. Therefore, we analyzed automation classification schemes from different disciplines (e.g., cars) and assessed various model possibilities as well as characteristics. We conclude that a 2-dimensional model with the axis ‘decision’ and ‘level of automation’ is most appropriate and provide an overview table with examples.

University of Augsburg (DE), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automation for digital forensics: Towards a classification model for the community — Frank Breitinger, Gaëtan Michelet · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS