Comparison of External and Internal Training Loads in Elite Junior Male Tennis Players During Offensive vs. Defensive Strategy Conditions: A Pilot Study

The aim of our pilot study was to investigate the effects of offensive and defensive strategy conditions on external and internal training load factors in male tennis players. This study included six elite junior male tennis players (chronological age: 15.7 ± 1.0; body height: 180.7 ± 6.5 cm; body mass: 71.0 ± 10.8 kg) who had to play two simulated matches. Among the external training load variables, running activities were measured with a GPS sensor operating at 10 Hz and a 100 Hz tri-axial piezoelectric linear accelerometer integrated into it; furthermore, tennis shot activities were measured with a tennis racket-mounted smart sensor. Internal training load was measured subjectively using the RPE method. The results show that players scored significantly higher on the PlayerLoad (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) and IMA CoD low right (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) running variables and on the forehand spin (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) and backhand spin (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) when using a defensive strategy. There were no significant differences between the two strategy conditions in all other external and internal training load parameters. The defensive strategy has more acceleration in all three planes of motion, suggesting that conditioning training should be placed in the intermittent endurance capacities for players who predominantly use this strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13040101
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of External and Internal Training Loads in Elite Junior Male Tennis Players During Offensive vs. Defensive Strategy Conditions: A Pilot Study

János Négyesi, Krisztián Havanecz, Łukasz Trzaskoma, Károly Dobos et al.
1 citations
Sports
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Comparison of External and Internal Training Loads in Elite Junior Male Tennis Players During Offensive vs. Defensive Strategy Conditions: A Pilot Study

János Négyesi, Krisztián Havanecz, Łukasz Trzaskoma, Károly Dobos, Csaba Ökrös, Gabriella Trzaskoma-Bicsérdy, Sándor Sáfár, Péter János Tóth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of our pilot study was to investigate the effects of offensive and defensive strategy conditions on external and internal training load factors in male tennis players. This study included six elite junior male tennis players (chronological age: 15.7 ± 1.0; body height: 180.7 ± 6.5 cm; body mass: 71.0 ± 10.8 kg) who had to play two simulated matches. Among the external training load variables, running activities were measured with a GPS sensor operating at 10 Hz and a 100 Hz tri-axial piezoelectric linear accelerometer integrated into it; furthermore, tennis shot activities were measured with a tennis racket-mounted smart sensor. Internal training load was measured subjectively using the RPE method. The results show that players scored significantly higher on the PlayerLoad (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) and IMA CoD low right (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) running variables and on the forehand spin (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) and backhand spin (<i>p</i> = 0.031; r = 0.90) when using a defensive strategy. There were no significant differences between the two strategy conditions in all other external and internal training load parameters. The defensive strategy has more acceleration in all three planes of motion, suggesting that conditioning training should be placed in the intermittent endurance capacities for players who predominantly use this strategy.

SportsVol. 13(4)
Eszterhazy Karoly Catholic University (HU), Hungarian School Sport Federation (HU), Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.