A Critique of Craftsmanship in Computational Design Practices

Since its early manifestations in ancient civilizations, craftsmanship has always been a fundamental aspect of human ingenuity. Today, the integration of digital tools and computational methods has been introducing new possibilities for the craft process. From this perspective, this study aims to explore and understand the multifaceted nature of craftsmanship in contemporary computational design practices. To do so, the study first provides an overview of craftsmanship, scrutinizing its historical roots, transformations during industrialization, and its enduring relevance in the digital era. Then, a cognitive framework is proposed to understand the process of craft, emphasizing the rhythm of knowledge production, the interplay of problem-solving and problem-finding, and the concept of slow time in skill development. Through the lens of this framework, the main characteristics of craftsmanship in computational design practices are interpreted as openness, nonlinearity, and complexity. The study also highlights the role of tool-making and interdisciplinary thinking in enhancing craftsmanship in computational design practices. Nevertheless, the study critiques computational design practices that prioritize efficiency and functionality over exploratory and reflective processes, which may undermine the potential essence of craftsmanship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Design
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.1505120
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critique of Craftsmanship in Computational Design Practices

Aysel Merve Baron
Journal of Computational Design
Design Education and Practice
article

A Critique of Craftsmanship in Computational Design Practices

Aysel Merve Baron
article en

Abstract

Since its early manifestations in ancient civilizations, craftsmanship has always been a fundamental aspect of human ingenuity. Today, the integration of digital tools and computational methods has been introducing new possibilities for the craft process. From this perspective, this study aims to explore and understand the multifaceted nature of craftsmanship in contemporary computational design practices. To do so, the study first provides an overview of craftsmanship, scrutinizing its historical roots, transformations during industrialization, and its enduring relevance in the digital era. Then, a cognitive framework is proposed to understand the process of craft, emphasizing the rhythm of knowledge production, the interplay of problem-solving and problem-finding, and the concept of slow time in skill development. Through the lens of this framework, the main characteristics of craftsmanship in computational design practices are interpreted as openness, nonlinearity, and complexity. The study also highlights the role of tool-making and interdisciplinary thinking in enhancing craftsmanship in computational design practices. Nevertheless, the study critiques computational design practices that prioritize efficiency and functionality over exploratory and reflective processes, which may undermine the potential essence of craftsmanship.

Journal of Computational DesignVol. 6(1)
Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Critique of Craftsmanship in Computational Design Practices — Aysel Merve Baron · Journal of Computational Design (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS