Impact Performance Analysis of Encapsulated Structures Considering Nonlinearity of Material and Adhesive Interfaces

Encapsulation is an effective solution for protecting electronic devices in impact environments. However, current research overlooked the impact of adhesive interfaces on stress wave attenuation. Additionally, most studies on the buffering properties of encapsulating materials have focused on epoxy resin, while silicone rubber is also used in impact environments. Moreover, research on the buffering performance of silicone rubber encapsulating systems and comparative analyses of these two materials remain lacking. To address this limitation, this study presented a modeling approach based on the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of encapsulated materials and the nonlinear characteristics of adhesive interfaces, and compared the buffering properties of epoxy resin and silicone rubber. Impact tests on epoxy resin and silicone rubber encapsulated structure specimens were conducted using a 100 mm diameter Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus under varying impact loads. Subsequently, static and dynamic compression tests on both materials were performed to obtain the nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive parameters of the Zhu–Wang–Tang (ZWT) model. Furthermore, Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests were carried out to acquire cohesive zone model parameters for the adhesive interfaces between the materials and outer shell. On this basis, the finite element models incorporating the nonlinear characteristics of the materials and interfaces were developed. The results showed that high-speed impacts induced interface failure during the testing process. The finite element model, which considered the nonlinear characteristics of the interfaces, showed good agreements with the experimental results, with acceleration errors not exceeding 10%. Compared to models neglecting the interface effects, the model with interfaces demonstrates reduced internal stress, confirming the impact of the adhesive interfaces on stress wave attenuation. Additionally, the study revealed that under low-speed impact loading, silicone rubber exhibited better buffering performance. However, under higher impact loads, adhesive interface failure occurred in the silicone rubber specimens, resulting in severe relative displacement and threat for inner down-lead. This study considered the nonlinear effects of materials and adhesive interfaces on the stress wave propagation in encapsulated structures, and compared the response of silicone rubber encapsulants under impact loading with that of epoxy resin. These findings offer a reference for future calculations and design of encapsulated structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Mechanics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1758825125500371
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Performance Analysis of Encapsulated Structures Considering Nonlinearity of Material and Adhesive Interfaces

Yang Li, Chunyan Zhou
2 links
International Journal of Applied Mechanics
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Impact Performance Analysis of Encapsulated Structures Considering Nonlinearity of Material and Adhesive Interfaces

Yang Li, Chunyan Zhou
article en

Abstract

Encapsulation is an effective solution for protecting electronic devices in impact environments. However, current research overlooked the impact of adhesive interfaces on stress wave attenuation. Additionally, most studies on the buffering properties of encapsulating materials have focused on epoxy resin, while silicone rubber is also used in impact environments. Moreover, research on the buffering performance of silicone rubber encapsulating systems and comparative analyses of these two materials remain lacking. To address this limitation, this study presented a modeling approach based on the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of encapsulated materials and the nonlinear characteristics of adhesive interfaces, and compared the buffering properties of epoxy resin and silicone rubber. Impact tests on epoxy resin and silicone rubber encapsulated structure specimens were conducted using a 100 mm diameter Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus under varying impact loads. Subsequently, static and dynamic compression tests on both materials were performed to obtain the nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive parameters of the Zhu–Wang–Tang (ZWT) model. Furthermore, Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests were carried out to acquire cohesive zone model parameters for the adhesive interfaces between the materials and outer shell. On this basis, the finite element models incorporating the nonlinear characteristics of the materials and interfaces were developed. The results showed that high-speed impacts induced interface failure during the testing process. The finite element model, which considered the nonlinear characteristics of the interfaces, showed good agreements with the experimental results, with acceleration errors not exceeding 10%. Compared to models neglecting the interface effects, the model with interfaces demonstrates reduced internal stress, confirming the impact of the adhesive interfaces on stress wave attenuation. Additionally, the study revealed that under low-speed impact loading, silicone rubber exhibited better buffering performance. However, under higher impact loads, adhesive interface failure occurred in the silicone rubber specimens, resulting in severe relative displacement and threat for inner down-lead. This study considered the nonlinear effects of materials and adhesive interfaces on the stress wave propagation in encapsulated structures, and compared the response of silicone rubber encapsulants under impact loading with that of epoxy resin. These findings offer a reference for future calculations and design of encapsulated structures.

International Journal of Applied MechanicsVol. 17(05)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.