Role of Immunochromatographic Techniques in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

The rapid and accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, is crucial for controlling its spread and managing public health responses. SARS-CoV-2 is an airborne virus transmitted through direct contact or respiratory droplets from infected individuals. While some patients exhibit clear symptoms, others remain asymptomatic, making early detection essential to prevent further transmission. Diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 primarily rely on two strategies: detecting viral RNA and identifying virus-specific antigens or antibodies. Viral RNA detection through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for identifying active infections. In contrast, immunochromatographic techniques (ICT) offer a rapid and cost-effective alternative by detecting viral antigens or host antibodies. Immunological assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) play a complementary role in identifying individuals with current or past infections. This review explores various molecular and serological methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. RT-PCR offers high sensitivity and specificity, detecting viral RNA in respiratory samples, saliva, blood, urine, and stool within hours. However, it requires expensive equipment and trained personnel, with accuracy affected by sample quality and test kit efficiency. CRISPR-based detection provides high sensitivity and specificity, delivering results within an hour and integrating with lateral flow assays without the need for a thermocycler. Lateral flow assays enable rapid detection within 15 minutes by non-professionals but are limited by delayed antibody production. ELISA and CLIA are useful for immunity assessment, though ELISA lacks early detection capabilities, and CLIA is costly, limiting accessibility in economically challenged regions. Selecting an optimal method depends on available resources, accuracy, and the need for rapid diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.908
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Immunochromatographic Techniques in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Muhammad Naeem, Munazza Ijaz, Hassan Shehryar Yasin, Sarfraz Ahmad et al.
Indus journal of bioscience research.
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Role of Immunochromatographic Techniques in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Muhammad Naeem, Munazza Ijaz, Hassan Shehryar Yasin, Sarfraz Ahmad, Muhammad Noman, Muhammad Riaz, Aqua Asif, Muhammad Abdullah Naeem
article en

Abstract

The rapid and accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, is crucial for controlling its spread and managing public health responses. SARS-CoV-2 is an airborne virus transmitted through direct contact or respiratory droplets from infected individuals. While some patients exhibit clear symptoms, others remain asymptomatic, making early detection essential to prevent further transmission. Diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 primarily rely on two strategies: detecting viral RNA and identifying virus-specific antigens or antibodies. Viral RNA detection through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for identifying active infections. In contrast, immunochromatographic techniques (ICT) offer a rapid and cost-effective alternative by detecting viral antigens or host antibodies. Immunological assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) play a complementary role in identifying individuals with current or past infections. This review explores various molecular and serological methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. RT-PCR offers high sensitivity and specificity, detecting viral RNA in respiratory samples, saliva, blood, urine, and stool within hours. However, it requires expensive equipment and trained personnel, with accuracy affected by sample quality and test kit efficiency. CRISPR-based detection provides high sensitivity and specificity, delivering results within an hour and integrating with lateral flow assays without the need for a thermocycler. Lateral flow assays enable rapid detection within 15 minutes by non-professionals but are limited by delayed antibody production. ELISA and CLIA are useful for immunity assessment, though ELISA lacks early detection capabilities, and CLIA is costly, limiting accessibility in economically challenged regions. Selecting an optimal method depends on available resources, accuracy, and the need for rapid diagnosis.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(3)
Punjab Medical College (PK), University of Faisalabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.