Light in motion – Effects of dynamic and static light patterns from nature on subjective and physiological stress

• Effects of static vs dynamic light patterns from nature were tested on stress. • Restorative effects were tested across low-stress, high-stress, and recovery periods. • Dynamic condition led to lower skin conductance levels than control during the stressor task. • Dynamic patterns were appraised as more natural, engaging, complex, and distracting. • Insights support the use of nature-inspired dynamic light to enhance restorativeness. Daylight, and particularly sunlight, is widely regarded as a source of pleasure and a contributor to restoration indoors. The positive effects of daylight are often attributed to its unique spatial, spectral, and temporal dynamics. However, most research employs static representations of daylight, overlooking its dynamic character. The shadow and light patterns of trees swaying in the breeze are prominent examples of dynamic sunlight patterns we observe daily. The current study investigated, for the first time, the effects of such light pattern projections on subjective and physiological stress in an office setup. Seventy-three participants were assigned to one of three conditions (projections of dynamic light pattern, static light pattern, or uniform control condition) and performed tasks representing low-stress, high-stress, and rest periods. No effect of the condition was found for the low-stress and recovery periods. However, exposure to the dynamic condition during the high-stress period showed significantly lower skin conductance levels than the control condition, indicating a stress-dampening effect. Similar trends were observed in heart rate and heart rate variability but did not reach statistical significance, while no effects were found on subjective stress. The dynamic condition attracted more attention and was perceived as more natural than the static and control conditions. Additionally, it was rated higher in positive affect and engagement, complexity, and distraction than the control condition. The findings of this study suggest that dynamic sunlight patterns from nature could enhance the design of indoor environments with stress-dampening qualities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112933
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Light in motion – Effects of dynamic and static light patterns from nature on subjective and physiological stress

Özge Karaman-Madan, Yvonne de Kort, Kynthia Chamilothori, J. van Duijnhoven et al.
4 citations
Building and Environment
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
3.66
article

Light in motion – Effects of dynamic and static light patterns from nature on subjective and physiological stress

Özge Karaman-Madan, Yvonne de Kort, Kynthia Chamilothori, J. van Duijnhoven, Mpj Mariëlle Aarts
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Effects of static vs dynamic light patterns from nature were tested on stress. • Restorative effects were tested across low-stress, high-stress, and recovery periods. • Dynamic condition led to lower skin conductance levels than control during the stressor task. • Dynamic patterns were appraised as more natural, engaging, complex, and distracting. • Insights support the use of nature-inspired dynamic light to enhance restorativeness. Daylight, and particularly sunlight, is widely regarded as a source of pleasure and a contributor to restoration indoors. The positive effects of daylight are often attributed to its unique spatial, spectral, and temporal dynamics. However, most research employs static representations of daylight, overlooking its dynamic character. The shadow and light patterns of trees swaying in the breeze are prominent examples of dynamic sunlight patterns we observe daily. The current study investigated, for the first time, the effects of such light pattern projections on subjective and physiological stress in an office setup. Seventy-three participants were assigned to one of three conditions (projections of dynamic light pattern, static light pattern, or uniform control condition) and performed tasks representing low-stress, high-stress, and rest periods. No effect of the condition was found for the low-stress and recovery periods. However, exposure to the dynamic condition during the high-stress period showed significantly lower skin conductance levels than the control condition, indicating a stress-dampening effect. Similar trends were observed in heart rate and heart rate variability but did not reach statistical significance, while no effects were found on subjective stress. The dynamic condition attracted more attention and was perceived as more natural than the static and control conditions. Additionally, it was rated higher in positive affect and engagement, complexity, and distraction than the control condition. The findings of this study suggest that dynamic sunlight patterns from nature could enhance the design of indoor environments with stress-dampening qualities.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 280
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.