Indian Stem Cell Research Governance after dissolution of the National Apex Committee

The Government of India recently disbanded the National Apex Committee for Stem Cell Research and Therapy (NAC-SCRT). This decision followed expert and public consultations held last year and will significantly alter the review processes for human stem cell research in India. The NAC-SCRT played a crucial role in crafting and updating regulatory guidelines, fostering research and national discourse in human stem cell research, and defining safety and quality standards. The Institutional Ethics Committees are now being tasked to review stem cell research at the organisation level after due inclusion of two stem cell experts. The decision to merge regulatory frameworks is a welcome step, reflecting a dynamic regulatory landscape that is responsive to scientific advancements and aims to reduce the compliance burden. The effective implementation of the revised mechanism, however, necessitates further clarity on which agency will now be responsible for tasks earlier mandated to NAC-SCRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2025.025
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indian Stem Cell Research Governance after dissolution of the National Apex Committee

Ketan Thorat
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Indian Stem Cell Research Governance after dissolution of the National Apex Committee

Ketan Thorat
article en

Abstract

The Government of India recently disbanded the National Apex Committee for Stem Cell Research and Therapy (NAC-SCRT). This decision followed expert and public consultations held last year and will significantly alter the review processes for human stem cell research in India. The NAC-SCRT played a crucial role in crafting and updating regulatory guidelines, fostering research and national discourse in human stem cell research, and defining safety and quality standards. The Institutional Ethics Committees are now being tasked to review stem cell research at the organisation level after due inclusion of two stem cell experts. The decision to merge regulatory frameworks is a welcome step, reflecting a dynamic regulatory landscape that is responsive to scientific advancements and aims to reduce the compliance burden. The effective implementation of the revised mechanism, however, necessitates further clarity on which agency will now be responsible for tasks earlier mandated to NAC-SCRT.

Indian Journal of Medical EthicsVol. X(3)
Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.