How to make EU enlargement a fairer and merit‐based process: A legal and policy analysis

Abstract Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the topic of EU enlargement has reached the top of the EU policy agenda, swiftly granting candidate status to Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, and unblocking some of the stalled accession processes in the Western Balkans. The paper examines the formal and substantive EU membership criteria and proposes ways to improve the accession process to make it more effective, fair and merit‐based. The paper recommends that the EU should improve its EU enlargement policy by adopting a two‐step accession process: joining the EU Single Market within 5 years of opening accession talks and achieving full EU membership within 10 years—subject to demonstrating a track record in upholding the EU's fundamental values. It also recommends improving the decision‐making process extending qualified‐majority voting (QMV) to EU enlargement policy to prevent Member States from politicising the accession process on issues unrelated to EU enlargement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Law Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12543
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to make EU enlargement a fairer and merit‐based process: A legal and policy analysis

Andi Hoxhaj
European Law Journal
European Union Policy and Governance
article

How to make EU enlargement a fairer and merit‐based process: A legal and policy analysis

Andi Hoxhaj
article en

Abstract

Abstract Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the topic of EU enlargement has reached the top of the EU policy agenda, swiftly granting candidate status to Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, and unblocking some of the stalled accession processes in the Western Balkans. The paper examines the formal and substantive EU membership criteria and proposes ways to improve the accession process to make it more effective, fair and merit‐based. The paper recommends that the EU should improve its EU enlargement policy by adopting a two‐step accession process: joining the EU Single Market within 5 years of opening accession talks and achieving full EU membership within 10 years—subject to demonstrating a track record in upholding the EU's fundamental values. It also recommends improving the decision‐making process extending qualified‐majority voting (QMV) to EU enlargement policy to prevent Member States from politicising the accession process on issues unrelated to EU enlargement.

European Law JournalVol. 30(4)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to make EU enlargement a fairer and merit‐based process: A legal and policy analysis — Andi Hoxhaj · European Law Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS