Formal and functional factors in classifier choice: Evidence from American Sign Language and Danish Sign Language

Abstract Traditionally so-called classifiers in productively formed verbs of motion and location in sign languages are said to reflect the semantic class of the moving or located entity. The verbs can include one of several different classifiers about humans and anthropomorphic beings. In this article, we examine phonological and semantic factors that influence the choice of classifier in elicited narratives in two sign languages, Danish Sign Language and American Sign Language. An analysis of classifiers expressed by handshapes of different phonological complexity shows quantitative differences between the two languages, but no influence on the choice of classifier depending on their phonological features. By contrast, a comparison of classifiers used about types of events in the languages reveals that the seemingly identical classifiers have language-specific meanings despite their iconicity. Nevertheless, they share features: hand-internal movement turns out to be statistically significantly correlated with voluntary actions in both languages. Two analyses of the verbs’ sequential behavior, in serial verb constructions and in verb doubling, show no differences between the classifiers used in either language as well as many structural similarities between the languages. The clearest difference between the languages is found at the lexical (unpredictable) level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Linguistics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2025-0043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formal and functional factors in classifier choice: Evidence from American Sign Language and Danish Sign Language

Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, John M. Davis, Diane Brentari
2 citations
Open Linguistics
Hearing Impairment and Communication
6.89
article

Formal and functional factors in classifier choice: Evidence from American Sign Language and Danish Sign Language

Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, John M. Davis, Diane Brentari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally so-called classifiers in productively formed verbs of motion and location in sign languages are said to reflect the semantic class of the moving or located entity. The verbs can include one of several different classifiers about humans and anthropomorphic beings. In this article, we examine phonological and semantic factors that influence the choice of classifier in elicited narratives in two sign languages, Danish Sign Language and American Sign Language. An analysis of classifiers expressed by handshapes of different phonological complexity shows quantitative differences between the two languages, but no influence on the choice of classifier depending on their phonological features. By contrast, a comparison of classifiers used about types of events in the languages reveals that the seemingly identical classifiers have language-specific meanings despite their iconicity. Nevertheless, they share features: hand-internal movement turns out to be statistically significantly correlated with voluntary actions in both languages. Two analyses of the verbs’ sequential behavior, in serial verb constructions and in verb doubling, show no differences between the classifiers used in either language as well as many structural similarities between the languages. The clearest difference between the languages is found at the lexical (unpredictable) level.

Open LinguisticsVol. 11(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.