Real-World Adverse Events of Isatuximab: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database and a Comparison with Daratumumab

Isatuximab, a cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38)-targeting monoclonal antibody, is used to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.This study aimed to detect the safety signal of isatuximab and to compare the reporting ratio with daratumumab, another CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody.Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from Q1 2020 to Q1 2022 were analyzed.A disproportionality analysis was performed, and adverse events (AEs) that satisfied the criteria for a safety signal were identified.The reporting odds ratio (ROR) of the safety signal was calculated for both isatuximab and daratumumab.The relative index (ROR ratio for fatigue) was compared between isatuximab and daratumumab.From 347 isatuximab-AE pairs, 14 were identified as safety signals.Three AEs (pulmonary embolism, atrial fibrillation, and tumor lysis syndrome) were not included on the drug label, although pulmonary embolism might be a complication of multiple myeloma or an AE of coadministered immunomodulatory agents instead.Squamous cell skin cancer (ROR, 84.25 vs. 6.12),pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (ROR, 67.78 vs. 2.94), lymphopenia (ROR, 26.66 vs. 1.96), bronchitis (ROR, 23.31 vs. 2.55), pneumonia (ROR, 19.52 vs. 3.39), pulmonary embolism (ROR, 18.22 vs. 3.97), atrial fibrillation (ROR, 12.51 vs. 3.93), and neutropenia (ROR, 4.48 vs. 1.47) were frequently reported with isatuximab.These AEs need to be considered when using isatuximab.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Targets and Therapeutics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58502/dtt.24.0017
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Adverse Events of Isatuximab: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database and a Comparison with Daratumumab

M Kim, Jae-Hee Kwon, Myeong Gyu Kim, Ja‐Young Han et al.
3 links
Drug Targets and Therapeutics
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Real-World Adverse Events of Isatuximab: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database and a Comparison with Daratumumab

M Kim, Jae-Hee Kwon, Myeong Gyu Kim, Ja‐Young Han, Eun-Jung Kim
article en

Abstract

Isatuximab, a cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38)-targeting monoclonal antibody, is used to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.This study aimed to detect the safety signal of isatuximab and to compare the reporting ratio with daratumumab, another CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody.Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from Q1 2020 to Q1 2022 were analyzed.A disproportionality analysis was performed, and adverse events (AEs) that satisfied the criteria for a safety signal were identified.The reporting odds ratio (ROR) of the safety signal was calculated for both isatuximab and daratumumab.The relative index (ROR ratio for fatigue) was compared between isatuximab and daratumumab.From 347 isatuximab-AE pairs, 14 were identified as safety signals.Three AEs (pulmonary embolism, atrial fibrillation, and tumor lysis syndrome) were not included on the drug label, although pulmonary embolism might be a complication of multiple myeloma or an AE of coadministered immunomodulatory agents instead.Squamous cell skin cancer (ROR, 84.25 vs. 6.12),pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (ROR, 67.78 vs. 2.94), lymphopenia (ROR, 26.66 vs. 1.96), bronchitis (ROR, 23.31 vs. 2.55), pneumonia (ROR, 19.52 vs. 3.39), pulmonary embolism (ROR, 18.22 vs. 3.97), atrial fibrillation (ROR, 12.51 vs. 3.93), and neutropenia (ROR, 4.48 vs. 1.47) were frequently reported with isatuximab.These AEs need to be considered when using isatuximab.

Drug Targets and TherapeuticsVol. 4(1)
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.