A Proposal of Certification Indicators for Civil Heritage Cultural Village in Terms of Territoriality: Focusing on Andong City

The purpose of this study is to propose the certification index of the ‘Citizen Heritage Cultural Village’ in terms of ‘territoriality’ for the development of certification indicators that reflect the needs of villagers' leading participation in the project in terms of village spatialization. To this end, first, the concept of ‘territoriality’ was clarified and the standard for suggestion of certification indicators was prepared by linking it with the concept of ‘locality’ as a means of practicing territoriality. Next, based on the proposal criteria, the ‘Citizen Heritage Cultural Village’ certification indicators were derived through domestic and international case studies. In order to examine the applicability of the derived certification indicators, the indicators were applied to three villages. The final certification indicators is 20 common indicators and 25 autonomous indicators, and if the common indicators are classified by four categories: subjectivity, location, innovation, and locality, which were the criteria for the proposed certification indicator system of “citizen heritage culture villages” according to the concept of spatial sovereignty, there are six indicators related to “subjectivity,” two indicators related to “locality,” seven indicators related to “innovation,” and five indicators related to “regionality.” In the case of autonomous indicators, there are six indicators related to “subjectivity,” seven indicators related to “locality,” seven indicators related to “innovation,”and five related to “regionality.” The composition of the sub-indicators of the certification indicators were related to securing the community and organizational foundation and network for the promotion of civil heritage cultural villages in the case of “subjectivity”, securing the tangible and intangible foundation of the region in the case of “locality“, “innovation“ in the vision and existing business promotion capabilities and performance to enhance its unique charm, and ”regionality” in terms of expanding and guaranteeing residents' cultural enjoyment, creating village brands and sustainable development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Association of Global Cultural Contents
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32611/jgcc.2025.2.62.275
Primary Topic
Korean Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Proposal of Certification Indicators for Civil Heritage Cultural Village in Terms of Territoriality: Focusing on Andong City

Nak Hyun Jung
Academic Association of Global Cultural Contents
Korean Urban and Social Studies
article

A Proposal of Certification Indicators for Civil Heritage Cultural Village in Terms of Territoriality: Focusing on Andong City

Nak Hyun Jung
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose the certification index of the ‘Citizen Heritage Cultural Village’ in terms of ‘territoriality’ for the development of certification indicators that reflect the needs of villagers' leading participation in the project in terms of village spatialization. To this end, first, the concept of ‘territoriality’ was clarified and the standard for suggestion of certification indicators was prepared by linking it with the concept of ‘locality’ as a means of practicing territoriality. Next, based on the proposal criteria, the ‘Citizen Heritage Cultural Village’ certification indicators were derived through domestic and international case studies. In order to examine the applicability of the derived certification indicators, the indicators were applied to three villages. The final certification indicators is 20 common indicators and 25 autonomous indicators, and if the common indicators are classified by four categories: subjectivity, location, innovation, and locality, which were the criteria for the proposed certification indicator system of “citizen heritage culture villages” according to the concept of spatial sovereignty, there are six indicators related to “subjectivity,” two indicators related to “locality,” seven indicators related to “innovation,” and five indicators related to “regionality.” In the case of autonomous indicators, there are six indicators related to “subjectivity,” seven indicators related to “locality,” seven indicators related to “innovation,”and five related to “regionality.” The composition of the sub-indicators of the certification indicators were related to securing the community and organizational foundation and network for the promotion of civil heritage cultural villages in the case of “subjectivity”, securing the tangible and intangible foundation of the region in the case of “locality“, “innovation“ in the vision and existing business promotion capabilities and performance to enhance its unique charm, and ”regionality” in terms of expanding and guaranteeing residents' cultural enjoyment, creating village brands and sustainable development.

Academic Association of Global Cultural ContentsVol. 62
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Korean Urban and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Proposal of Certification Indicators for Civil Heritage Cultural Village in Terms of Territoriality: Focusing on Andong City — Nak Hyun Jung · Academic Association of Global Cultural Contents (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS