Understanding individual differences in students’ responses to technology-based feedback on a writing task: the role of achievement motives and initial task performance

Computer-based feedback interventions are generally effective—but not for all students. Students’ achievement motives (hopes for success, fear of failure) might explain how students respond to feedback in interplay with initial task performance. In a sample of 949 secondary school students in Germany (Grades 7–9) we found that when the task criterion was initially not met, higher hopes for success were positively associated with students’ subsequent task performance after receiving automated feedback. When the criterion was initially met, a higher fear of failure was negatively related to the subsequent task performance. Our results suggest that achievement motives can play a complex role at different levels of initial task performance. These insights could inform personalized feedback design to enhance feedback effectiveness in cognitively demanding tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2471765
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding individual differences in students’ responses to technology-based feedback on a writing task: the role of achievement motives and initial task performance

Jennifer Meyer, Martin Daumiller, Thorben Jansen, Johanna Fleckenstein
6 citations
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
53.56
article

Understanding individual differences in students’ responses to technology-based feedback on a writing task: the role of achievement motives and initial task performance

Jennifer Meyer, Martin Daumiller, Thorben Jansen, Johanna Fleckenstein
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Computer-based feedback interventions are generally effective—but not for all students. Students’ achievement motives (hopes for success, fear of failure) might explain how students respond to feedback in interplay with initial task performance. In a sample of 949 secondary school students in Germany (Grades 7–9) we found that when the task criterion was initially not met, higher hopes for success were positively associated with students’ subsequent task performance after receiving automated feedback. When the criterion was initially met, a higher fear of failure was negatively related to the subsequent task performance. Our results suggest that achievement motives can play a complex role at different levels of initial task performance. These insights could inform personalized feedback design to enhance feedback effectiveness in cognitively demanding tasks.

Journal of Research on Technology in Education
University of Vienna (AT), University of Hildesheim (DE), University of Augsburg (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE), Pädagogische Hochschule Wien (AT)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Jacobs Foundation, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Student Assessment and Feedback
53.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding individual differences in students’ responses to technology-based feedback on a writing task: the role of achievement motives and initial task performance — Jennifer Meyer, Martin Daumiller, et al. · Journal of Research on Technology in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS