Evaluating the paradox of whistleblower protections: how explicit safeguards influence reporting behavior among independent auditors

Purpose This study aims to examine the paradoxical effects of explicit whistleblower protection mechanisms on auditors’ propensity to report unethical conduct in audit firms. Specifically, it seeks to determine whether these protections, while intended to foster ethical reporting, inadvertently suppress whistleblowing due to the perceived risks to auditors’ career progression. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a rigorous experimental design. It involved 561 auditors systematically assigned to 1 of 4 distinct scenarios, each featuring varying degrees of whistleblower protection. Advanced statistical techniques, including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and ordered logistic regressions, were used to robustly evaluate the relationship between explicit protections and the likelihood of reporting misconduct. Findings This study uncovers a counterintuitive outcome: explicit protections, rather than encouraging whistleblowing, may diminish auditors’ willingness to report unethical behavior. The results indicate that when explicit protections are emphasized, auditors perceive more career-related risks and reduce reporting intentions. These findings underscore the necessity of a nuanced approach to developing whistleblower policies. Practical implications The findings provide actionable insights for audit firms in crafting whistleblower policies that promote ethical behavior. This study highlights the importance of designing protections to mitigate perceived career risks without unintentionally deterring whistleblowing. Originality/value This study significantly contributes to the whistleblowing literature by challenging the assumption that explicit protections invariably promote ethical reporting. It offers a novel perspective on the intricate dynamics between protective measures and auditors’ ethical decision-making, advancing our understanding of how such mechanisms function in professional practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-08-2024-0194
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the paradox of whistleblower protections: how explicit safeguards influence reporting behavior among independent auditors

Wenner Gláucio Lopes Lucena, Marília Augusta Raulino Jácome, Diego Antônio Bittencourt Marconatto, Ingrid Laís de Sena Costa et al.
1 citations
Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración
Ethics in Business and Education
4.17
article

Evaluating the paradox of whistleblower protections: how explicit safeguards influence reporting behavior among independent auditors

Wenner Gláucio Lopes Lucena, Marília Augusta Raulino Jácome, Diego Antônio Bittencourt Marconatto, Ingrid Laís de Sena Costa, Claudimar Pereira da Veiga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the paradoxical effects of explicit whistleblower protection mechanisms on auditors’ propensity to report unethical conduct in audit firms. Specifically, it seeks to determine whether these protections, while intended to foster ethical reporting, inadvertently suppress whistleblowing due to the perceived risks to auditors’ career progression. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a rigorous experimental design. It involved 561 auditors systematically assigned to 1 of 4 distinct scenarios, each featuring varying degrees of whistleblower protection. Advanced statistical techniques, including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and ordered logistic regressions, were used to robustly evaluate the relationship between explicit protections and the likelihood of reporting misconduct. Findings This study uncovers a counterintuitive outcome: explicit protections, rather than encouraging whistleblowing, may diminish auditors’ willingness to report unethical behavior. The results indicate that when explicit protections are emphasized, auditors perceive more career-related risks and reduce reporting intentions. These findings underscore the necessity of a nuanced approach to developing whistleblower policies. Practical implications The findings provide actionable insights for audit firms in crafting whistleblower policies that promote ethical behavior. This study highlights the importance of designing protections to mitigate perceived career risks without unintentionally deterring whistleblowing. Originality/value This study significantly contributes to the whistleblowing literature by challenging the assumption that explicit protections invariably promote ethical reporting. It offers a novel perspective on the intricate dynamics between protective measures and auditors’ ethical decision-making, advancing our understanding of how such mechanisms function in professional practice.

Academia Revista Latinoamericana de AdministraciónVol. 38(2)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Federal do Tocantins (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR), Fundação Dom Cabral (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Business and Education
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.